Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Sophos Intercept X for Server

Cybereason is good at detections and has some false positives, but when we need their support, it's too slow. My team used to test Cybereason, submitting lots of malware and threats, trying to find problems, and for research purposes. In my experience, every time we found a bug, their support team denied the problems and took lots of weeks to give some answer when we insisted.

Incentivized

We recently had a malware incident in our organization where we lost some of our files from the system and we were not able to detect the threat. That's when we deployed Sophos. Sophos Intercept X ticks all the boxes. It has helped prevent unauthorized programs from running and provides a managed threat response. The best part is its ability to recover files automatically.

Incentivized

• EDR
• Threat hunting
• anti-malware
• collecting telemetry

Incentivized

• Baseline policies
• Central management
• Secure

Incentivized

• Slow support
• Bugs on their interface
• Log extraction

Incentivized

• Reporting isn't as detailed as it could be.
• The wait times for support are very long.
• There is no way to push the installer out.

Incentivized

Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.

Incentivized

We have been utilizing Sophos Intercept X for Server for many years now, but previously we used Symantec. This was before a push for everything into the cloud - so I feel a fair comparison of the products is not possible. Symantec worked for us at the time, but I'm not fluent in current offerings from them.

Incentivized

• Helps on threat hunting
• MalOps is very good
• When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond

Incentivized

• Prevented virus/hacker attacks on our servers
• Have blocked applications that we do not allow
• Saved time on tracking virus, ransomware etc.

Incentivized