TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Couchbase Server

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ACouchbase Server is a cloud-native, distributed database that fuses the strengths of relational databases such as SQL and ACID transactions with JSON flexibility and scale that defines NoSQL. It is available as a service in commercial clouds and supports hybrid and private cloud deployments.N/A

    DataStax Enterprise

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ADataStax Enterprise (DSE) is the scale-out, cloud-native NoSQL database built on Apache Cassandra. DSE is Developer Ready providing developers the freedom of choice of REST, GraphQL, CQL and JSON/Document APIs.N/A
    Pricing
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Considered Both Products
    Couchbase
    Chose Couchbase Server
    Experience with DataStax Cassandra was seamless, but the cost and effort to support it was not justified. Also commercial process experience with Couchbase was much better. ActiveSpaces is a good technology for big TIBCO shop, but keeping with the lifecycle of it is not easy. I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Couchbase Server
    I have used DataStax, but comparatively, I would say Couchbase is more reliable than DataStax, as it is a complete package and consists of every feature in order to satisfy users needs. However, DataStax lacks some of the features. I prefer Couchbase over all other similar …
    Incentivized
    DataStax
    Chose DataStax Enterprise
    I believe DataStax Enterprise is the best in class. There are some things that are different with the schema-less systems but I found DataStax Enterprise easiest to implement while evaluating. The replication is on par or better than others in practice. We are evaluating …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    27 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Couchbase Server and DataStax Enterprise
    Feature
    Couchbase Server
    8.9
    97 Ratings
    1% above category average
    DataStax Enterprise
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Performance8.997 Ratings9.13 Ratings
    Availability9.496 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Concurrency8.994 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Security9.094 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Scalability9.495 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Data model flexibility9.095 Ratings5.13 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility8.094 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Small Businesses
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (100 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    2.1
    (3 ratings)
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.3
    (95 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    9.3
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.0
    (52 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Couchbase ServerDataStax Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Couchbase
    Best suited when edge devices have interrupted internet connection. And Couchbase provides reliable data transfer. If used for attachment Couchbase has a very poor offering. A hard limit of 20 MB is not okay. They have the best conflict resolution but not so great query language on Couchbase lite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    Real-time transaction processing (both reads and writes) is where DataStax Enterprise shines. It's very fast with linear scalability should more resources be needed. Additional nodes are added very easily. DataStax Enterprise on its own (without Solr or Spark enabled) isn't well suited for long complicated reports. The data model doesn't support joining multiple tables together which is common in BI reporting.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Couchbase
    • Couchbase performance is exceptional both for in-memory and persisted transactions.
    • Handling of node failures and cluster rebalancing (high availability).
    • Enterprise support from Couchbase themselves
    • Good documentation
    • Streaming of bucket (database) level mutations via their Database Change Protocol (DCP).
    • Replication of datasets between native clients and Couchbase buckets
    • Handling of simultaneous writes to the same record with performance penalties
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    • Datastax Cassandra provides high availability and good performance for a database. It is built on top of open source Apache Cassandra so you can always somewhat understand the internal functioning and why.
    • Datastax Cassandra is fairly simple to start using, you can install/setup your cluster and be productive in 1 day.
    • Datastax Cassandra provides a lot of good detailed documentation, and when starting, the detailed free videos on the Datastax site and documentation are very helpful.
    • Datastax Enterprise Edition of Cassandra provides more tools, good support, and quick response SLA for enterprise business support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Couchbase
    • The N1QL engine performs poorly compared to SQL engines due to the number of interactions needed, so if your use case involves the need for a lot of SQL-like query activity as opposed to the direct fetch of data in the form of a key/value map you may want to consider a RDBMS that has support for json data types so that you can more easily mix the use of relational and non-relational approaches to data access.
    • You have to be careful when using multiple capabilities (e.g. transactions with Sync Gateway) as you will typically run into problems where one technology may not operate correctly in combination with another.
    • There are quality problems with some newly released features, so be careful with being an early adopter unless you really need the capability. We somewhat desperately adopted the use of transactions, but went through multiple bughunt cycles with Couchbase working the kinks out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    • Cassandra is a bit difficult to learn and understand
    • The costs are slightly higher for our company
    • Hardware requirement is moderate to high at the beginning
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Couchbase
    I rarely actually use Couchbase Server, I just stay up-to-date with the features that it provides. However, when the need arises for a NoSQL datastore, then I will strongly consider it as an option
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    We will continue to use it because it scales well with commodity hardware and we are satisfied with the documentation and support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Couchbase
    Couchbase has been quite a usable for our implementation. We had similar experience with our previous "trial" implementation, however it was short lived.
    Couchbase has so far exceeded expectation. Our implementation team is more confident than ever before.
    When we are Live for more than 6 months, I'm hoping to enhance this rating.
    Read full review
    DataStax
    There is a bit of a learning curve and tasks that are simple in traditional RDBMS systems can be complicated with DataStax Enterprise but once you get the hang of denormalizing data and getting the data model correct DataStax Enterprise is very usable. Usability from the developer's standpoint is very simple - the complication is on the architecture side with the data model.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Couchbase
    One of Couchbase’s greatest assets is its performance with large datasets. Properly set up with well-sized clusters, it is also highly reliable and scalable. User management could be better though, and security often feels like an afterthought. Couchbase has improved tremendously since we started using it, so I am sure that these issues will be ironed out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Couchbase
    I haven't had many opportunities to request support, I will look forward to better the rating. We have technical development and integration team who reach out directly to TAM at Couchbase.
    Read full review
    DataStax
    DataStax has the best community. They have instant customer support to solve problems and are knowledgeable of the problems faced by the customer. The documentation is pretty top-notch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Couchbase
    The Apache Cassandra was one type of product used in our company for a couple of use-cases. The Aerospike is something we [analyzed] not so long time ago as an interesting alternative, due to its performance characteristics. The Oracle Coherence was and is still being used for [the] distributed caching use-case, but it will be replaced eventually by Couchbase. Though each of these products [has] its own strengths and weaknesses, we prefer sticking to Couchbase because of [the] experience we have with this product and because it is cost-effective for our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    DataStax Enterprise offered best-in-class write performance and scalability. The customer support team was very helpful in the adoption of new technology.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Couchbase
    So far, the way that we mange and upgrade our clusters has be very smooth. It works like a dream when we use it in concert with AWS and their EC2 machines. Having access to powerful instances along side the Couchbase interface is amazing and allows us to do rebalances or maintenance without a worry
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Couchbase
    • Great performance.
    • Leading Couchbase Lite capabilities for mobile use.
    • Developers' learning curve with replica reads and multi cluster can be long. Needs guidance and nurturing.
    • Cluster maintenance during OS patching, etc. has multiple ways to approach. Operational teams may need some guidance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DataStax
    • Highly Scalable Database, Highly Available Services, and Platforms.
    • High Performance, Low Latency and Highest throughput across varying workloads.
    • Configured, Tuned and Monitored correctly works to provide the best user experience!
    • Negative: Maintenance and Debugging Corner Cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots