Cornerstone OnDemand is a cloud-based application for talent management. Cornerstone offers suites for recruiting, training, performance monitoring and planning, learning, and HR data management. It is scaled for enterprises.
N/A
KeldairHR
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Hyrell is a cloud-based applicant tracking system. Its capabilities include batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels like email, social recruiting, and job boards, employee screening and testing, resume parsing, data management, and analytics.
$299
per month
Pricing
Cornerstone OnDemand
KeldairHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Up to 5 Open Jobs
$299
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 10 Open Jobs
$499
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 20 Open Jobs
$799
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 30 Open Jobs
$1049
per month with an annual agreement
More then 30 Open Jobs
Contact Company
per month with an annual agreement
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cornerstone OnDemand
KeldairHR
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Pay for the number of open positions you plan to have and you get unlimited users, all the core features, unlimited applicants, and unlimited storage.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cornerstone OnDemand
KeldairHR
Features
Cornerstone OnDemand
KeldairHR
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone OnDemand
7.7
131 Ratings
5% above category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.968 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.8113 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.4124 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone OnDemand
7.9
113 Ratings
10% above category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.794 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
8.097 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.4105 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
7.893 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.6108 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone OnDemand
7.4
118 Ratings
12% above category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Performance plans
7.692 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
7.279 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.468 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
7.380 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
8.095 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
7.363 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
7.892 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
7.084 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
6.881 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.3112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone OnDemand
7.8
57 Ratings
12% above category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
7.048 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
8.048 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
7.851 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
8.448 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone OnDemand
7.2
65 Ratings
0% above category average
KeldairHR
8.4
11 Ratings
5% above category average
Job Requisition Management
7.844 Ratings
8.49 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.940 Ratings
9.310 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
6.437 Ratings
7.87 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
6.437 Ratings
10.011 Ratings
Customized Application Form
7.839 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Resume Management
6.442 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.739 Ratings
8.110 Ratings
Candidate Search
6.440 Ratings
8.910 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.540 Ratings
10.011 Ratings
Collaboration
7.835 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.237 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
Email Templates
7.558 Ratings
10.011 Ratings
User Permissions
7.859 Ratings
10.011 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.454 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Reporting
7.662 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
I feel Cornerstone OnDemand is a great solution for companies that have a large amount of compliance training that needs to be assigned and closely tracked. The features of dynamic groups (based on specific user criteria) allows you to target very specific audiences. The assignment functionality gives you great flexibility on when the assignment runs and how often, and also provides many options for due dates (static date or dynamic date - x days from hire date, date assigned, etc.). This has allowed us to have a clear and consistent user experience for both our newly hired employees and our seasoned employees.
It is great at getting applicants to apply. The one down side is that a majority of our applicants are applying from a mobile device so they are unable to complete the entire application process. When you send them a link to complete the rest of the application from a desktop computer, many do not have access to this. Because of this, they do not answer some of the "weed out" questions that give us insight as to what type of employee they would be.
Automatic recurring assignments are easy to get that refresher training out without needing to assign it fresh each time.
Reporting 2.0 makes it easy to write and share your reports with just selected filters. Making it easy for people receiving it to just change what they need to see.
Learning Admin Console makes it easy to peek at what is going on in your portal and open up connected reporting when needed.
Success Center is a great resource for getting peer answers to questions and learning about the releases and suggesting changes that should be added to the roadmap.
Automatic position posting has increased our exposure drastically as an employer. We have increased our applicant flow by over 100%.
Hyrell's applicant communication features have allowed us to stay engaged with candidates during every step of the hiring process. It makes for a very professional first impression.
I love that Hyrell is user-friendly. The system is incredibly easy to use. We have a high number of users throughout nine locations with varying skill levels utilizing technical applications. All of our users seemed to catch on very quickly.
Sometimes finding the right answer to your support question can be a bit more difficult than it should be.
I would like to see more OSHA related courses.
At times, the administrative interface seems to need to be updated, but the tradeoff honestly might be the absolute rock-solid stability of the platform.
The main issue I have with the system is that in order for a template update to take effect, it has to be re-posted (at least that's the process as I understand it.) For example, I have updated one of our existing job templates to include a new hard skill question. The template is posted in over 50 locations and in order for this update to go into effect, I have to manually re-post these positions which can be very time consuming. If there was a way to automatically update a posting with template changes it would be a huge help to our business.
As long as pricing stays reasonable, we will likely stay with Cornerstone for at least one more contract renewal. It would be a large task to migrate all of our content to a new system. However, the LMS landscape is diversifying with new startups that are showing some real innovation.
Easy to use, easy to learn, lots of support during the learning process. There are a few parts of the system we don't use and I'm hesitant to begin using because other clients have said they're difficult and cumbersome (certifications) or outdated (libraries)
Meets all expectations for application processing. Does a great job of pushing the job ad out to multiple online job boards. Provides good email alerts. Relatively easy to use even for my supervisors who are only in the system on occasion.
I haven't really had any major availability problems. The service is practically impeccable but it is true that at times, due to server and latency problems, the application has been slower. But these have been specific issues that have resolved themselves.
Pages do not load quickly. Often times any action or selection of a box, drop down, check, pretty much ANY Javascript interaction causes the whole entire page to load/reload/start doing something in the background. This makes a nightmare for having to mass edit courses or upload ILT sessions. It's the one of the archaic web designs they use that really bugs me as an admin and makes working in the portal at times intolerable and insufferable
Its always important to have support when you are facing problems and when you are the main admin of the organization. Cornerstone Support is very supporting when you have not found the answer in the help guide. its very useful to have a team support to guide you.
I have never had to wait for response. Someone always speaks directly to me, sometimes more than once, and email follow-up keeps the issue in the field of vision until there is a resolution.
we use also to admin all our training in person events and sessions. Its easy to admin this kind of trainings and automatize some processes we have. Also de user experience and the integration with other systems helps to the employees to use more. All modules integrated oriented to develop people is the principal reason to have CSOD. The training administration is very complete and allows to automate many processes.
The online modules are pretty good. You can access them at any time, which we have done. You learn a lot in the beginning, but having the ability to retake short lessons when you are working on those items was very helpful.
The implementation was pretty difficult. We felt they (Cornerstone) didn’t properly allocate the resources to complete our implementation in the timetable we wanted.
For example, we worked on Workday and SSO integrations - work that we had specifically contracted for in advance. When we were ready to work on that project, they didn’t have the people ready to help us, so it took a lot longer than necessary. That was my biggest pain point.
The implementation approach we went with was a self-led implementation. We would speak to the implementation manager once per week, and self-trained. We met with implementation manager to discuss issues, review things that we’d learned for 1 hour. We found that wasn’t enough. Other things would come up outside that one hour window that we couldn’t get answers to. We didn’t have anyone to ask about those things and we had to wait to ask during our weekly meeting.
The advantage of the self-led implementation approach was that it was really inexpensive – significantly less than the implementation cost for the other systems that we looked at. I also liked that we could pace ourselves. There were however big roadblocks. We would have to make sure the right resources were available. We had an implementation/project manager with a lot of experience and felt that the person was knowledgeable but missed on a few things.
In hindsight, I would still go with the self-led implementation, but knowing what I know now, I would ask for the integration person to be available more. I would work that into the contract. With single sign-on, we needed deep linking to build direct links through a Single Sign-On tool, e.g. when someone gets an email, it directs them to training. But it has to go through SSO to get them to the correct link. Deep linking wasn’t turned on in our system and they had to activate it. We encountered little things like that – sequencing pre-requisites which were problematic. We tried to troubleshoot ourselves.
I recommend you consider contracting for some extra implementation hours and determine when they are going to be available. Work it into the contract that you have the ability to call tech support during implementation. In addition to weekly implementation meetings, they have technical webexes – 4 every week, but 2 didn’t apply to us – one as we were using SSO. The challenge is they were not always relevant – we had specific questions that didn’t fall into those categories
The user experience is a lot better than using SumTotal as an admin CSOD makes working easy. Without having workarounds. Reporting is a lot better than both platforms. Reporting in CSOD is complex however easy to manage and create when you understand the data points collected
Hyrell came up against ClearFit and ZipRecruiter. ClearFit looked very strong, but ultimately its pay per posting model didn't provide enough cost certainty. ZipRecruiter seems to be a strong player too. There was a lot of flash with ZipRecruiter but the product didn't seem as complete where it mattered for my client. Hyrell was a good balance on feature set and provided good value. The client needed something that was easy to use so they could get up and running quickly. The Hyrell trial went well and the ramp up was very quick and easy. Hyrell's subscript plans fit my clients needs starting with the Solo plan (3 active jobs) and then quickly moving up to the Small Business plan (9 active jobs) after a few months once additional hiring managers came on-board.
It is important to be familiar with the terms and annual increases in licenses and other aspects of the contract. I recommend analyzing this from the beginning and the permanence is relevant because Cornerstone updates its modules and brings out new features that may allow you to leave a module to acquire another
Hyrell has kept us moving, tracking and hiring strong candidates, even has we have moved from hiring 1 or 2 people a month to 3 or 4 a week! Great program, good features and fantastic supportl (Thanks, Emily!!!)
As I have said before, I have no doubt that the services of the Cornerstone sales people were very good. In particular, our salesperson spent a lot of time in contact with us to make the process go smoothly. Perhaps being a large company in some cases the times were slowed down but it is something normal to take into account.