Corezoid Process Engine vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Corezoid Process Engine
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Corezoid Process Engine - a tool to build, manage, host, and run processes in the cloud without coding. The platform aism to increase time-to-market speed and decreases maintenance costs by shifting the paradigm from hardcoding processes by software engineers to assembling processes by any non-tech people. Corezoid Process Engine benefits for each team member: 1. Managers can set up their own real-time dashboards and escalations in just a few clicks to stay up to date…
$30
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
Pricing
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
XS
$30.00
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup Fee$30 No setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Features
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Corezoid Process Engine
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.3
6 Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Corezoid Process Engine
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.2
6 Ratings
25% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings9.75 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
User Ratings
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Corezoid Process EngineProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
Read full review
Pros
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
  • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
  • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Read full review
Cons
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Read full review
Usability
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
Scalability
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Middleware Inc.
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Corezoid Process Engine Screenshots

Screenshot of ProcessScreenshot of WorkflowScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Diagram