CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended) vs. IBM Cloud Private

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
CoreOS rkt or Container Linux was a rival to Docker that was acquired by Red Hat, then given to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). The project has since been discontinued.N/A
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics.N/A
Pricing
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Features
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Private
9.7
Ratings
19% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoreOS rkt / Container Linux (project ended)IBM Cloud Private
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very well suited for local testing where one knows what is being worked on and knows all the dependencies of the software project. On the other hand, it would be less appropriate in situations where a simple chroot can do the trick without the overhead of running a Go application.
Read full review
IBM Cloud Private is well suited for SaaS models.
Read full review
Pros
  • Running a secure container without messing up with low-level details
  • Very clear and straightforward approach to building a container
  • A way to go for new projects thinking of containers
  • Comprehensive and well-written documentation compatible with UNIX keep it simple way of thinking
Read full review
  • There is a large variety of services available on IBM Cloud.
  • This is my first experience with a PaaS and I haven’t had any major problems navigating around it.
  • It is easy to deploy applications and services on IBM Cloud.
Read full review
Cons
  • Market share, it's often very difficult to find new talent who use CoreOS rkt.
  • Lack of wow features, CoreOS rkt doesn't necessarily offer any immediate advantages over other container solutions.
Read full review
  • More hands on training outside of virtual classes would be helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We evaluated CoreOS rkt and Docker when selecting software solutions for my department. We ended up using CoreOS rkt because of how well it fits with CoreOS and the choice of gRPC for the API. We provide a managed service that runs CoreOS on a bare metal server, CoreOS rkt was a logical choice for compatibility. We also found that developers were having better scusess interacting with gRPC than other container engines REST protocols. It was a close race but eventually there were just enough small benefits to push CoreOS rkt in front of the competition.
Read full review
With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Developers spend less time configuring and more time coding.
  • Less time training developers as CoreOS rkt lets them use whatever hardware and operating system they want.
  • Reduced our IT costs, solutions are containerized using CoreOS rkt meaning they can write one solution with many developers in mind.
Read full review
  • N/A
  • N/A
  • N/A
Read full review
ScreenShots