Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. MIP Fund Accounting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform, including technology from the former Determine Selectica CPQ solution acquired by Corcentric in April 2019, is designed to provide a customizable CPQ solution to cover an enterprise's need to offer many possible permutations of combinations of product and service in a streamlined fashion.N/A
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
MIP Fund Accounting™ is a configurable fund accounting solution. The solution includes functionality for fund accounting, procurement, budgeting, payroll, human resources, timekeeping, fixed asset management, grant management, and dashboards for nonprofits and government agencies.N/A
Pricing
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Best Alternatives
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Online
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Sage Intacct
Sage Intacct
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformMIP Fund Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
Read full review
MIP Fund Accounting works very well for general fundraising. The form creation process is easy and allows you to set parameters and add fees, quantities, images, etc. This process is smooth on the customer (forward-facing) side as well. Reports are generated once the transactions have gone through, making tracking and reconciliation with accounting easy.
Read full review
Pros
  • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
  • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
  • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
Read full review
  • General Ledger processing, including journal entries and reports
  • Ability to download all reports directly to Excel and PDF formats
  • Use of Grant codes to enable grant reporting by month/quarter/year
  • Ability to have multiple departments and consolidate into groups for reporting
  • Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable cannot be out of balance
  • Multiple ways to use the product including Cloud and Classic options, Visual menu or Standard (Top of screen) menus to select processes, many options we are not using in our simple organization
Read full review
Cons
  • Model builder's sluggishness.
Read full review
  • With the payroll process, if there is an error in sending the stubs through email, there is no option to resend without a restore. That really needs to change.
  • Being able to void encumbrance at the same time as a PO would be an incredible time saver.
  • When processing W2 the system deletes info.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
Read full review
I give MIP a 10 because Our organization use MIP Fund Accounting ever since I've been there and that's been for over 20 plus years for all of our accounting and payroll. MIP has stayed on the cutting edge of technology, ever evolving to meet the needs of the times, especially post pandemic, while many are working remotely! MIP support staff are very knowledgeable and efficient. Even new users can get up to speed quickly with MIP Fund Accounting.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I don't know what it would be like in the for-profit arena, but for the non-profit arena, it is an excellent product. I love how you don't actually have to close years and are able to get information that spans over the year-end. And the grant tracking is excellent too. It is just an excellent accounting system.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I have rarely encountered any issues accessing MIP Fund Accounting over the years. On the rare occasions when availability was interrupted, the reasons were always found in-house when using the on-premises version. Since we have migrated to the MIP cloud, we have had no issues with availability. Any maintenance or updates are always communicated to us and are usually done outside of business hours.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
MIP Fund Accounting is an important asset for performing search queries. If I had to do a historical search query without MIP Fund Accounting, I very well might have to pull data from three different programs, turn each piece into like-data myself, and then consolidate it all down into interpretive data. MIP Fund Accounting does it all by itself and has a wide array of ways to filter down as specifically or broadly as you want for any given query.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have not reached out to MIP for technical support; however, their website offers great help resources so I can solve an issue on my own. Another team member reached out to MIP for support and was helped quickly. The transition process took longer than expected due to a lag in communication.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
There are no specifics on what happens if you make one choice or another to know which is the best selection. This is true for JVs and AP. In training we were not given specifics of what happens when one possibility is selected over another.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training with Laura was amazing. She had answered all our questions and customized the training to our needs that we are working with and trying to address using MIP accounting. The only thing I wish that could come out of the trainings was to have permanent access to the recordings of our paid trainings we received. They recordings of the training only last for a short time before it goes away which makes it hard to go back and re-watch and learn.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Again, I was not directly involved with the planning and setup of the software. However, I was involved in training my staff during the implementation phase. As with any software implementation, consistency of training is key and a willingness to seek out help from Customer Support helps tremendously to insure accuracy of information and training.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Saleslogix.
Read full review
I've utilized other ERP accounting software like Infor, NetSuite, and MS Dynamics, to name a few. MIP Fund Accounting offers flexibility and room for growth while not being overly heavy on your team to maintain it. And, we're now learning more about the add-on's and more advanced capabilities to leverage with our team.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
MIP is easy to install and use on my work laptop. I can still use the software when travelling for work or when working from home. It is always reliable and effective. This applies to other people on our organization as well. Employees who need access to the MIP database are able to access it from their desktop computers or laptops
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
  • reduced sales cycle.
  • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
Read full review
  • When used, it also visibility to how we are using our allotted Government funds. It allows us to make sure we are being efficient with those dollars.
  • MIP Fund Accounting allows us to be more accurate in posting expenses. It allows us to be sure of which accounts are we are posting to. We can pull those accounts in real time and make sure that our entries are having the desired effect on the accounts involved.
  • MIP Fund Accounting allows accountability in that we can see who posted what, when they posted, and to which accounts they posted.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MIP Fund Accounting Screenshots

Screenshot of MIP Advance™ Dashboards with drilldownScreenshot of MIP™ Transactions WorkflowScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP Dashboard drilldownScreenshot of MIP Transactions