Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. JAGGAER

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform, including technology from the former Determine Selectica CPQ solution acquired by Corcentric in April 2019, is designed to provide a customizable CPQ solution to cover an enterprise's need to offer many possible permutations of combinations of product and service in a streamlined fashion.N/A
JAGGAER
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A
Pricing
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformJAGGAER
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformJAGGAER
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformJAGGAER
User Ratings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformJAGGAER
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformJAGGAER
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
Read full review
The SciQuest application helps guide users toward preferred suppliers. The efficiencies experienced in both sending out orders to suppliers as well as bringing back invoices helps our users maintain their inventories as well as allowing them to better understand the condition of their budgets and spend because of the quick turnaround
Read full review
Pros
  • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
  • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
  • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
Read full review
  • The workflow works great for routing requisitions to the appropriate approvers. It's also very customizable to adapt workflow to fit our current policies.
  • SciQuest pushes requisitions straight into our ERP, eliminating the need for duplicate data entry.
  • Punchouts are a great time saver for our end users to compare pricing within the same system.
Read full review
Cons
  • Model builder's sluggishness.
Read full review
  • The UI is pretty dry form a user point of view (I've heard this many times by end users over the years)
  • Documents look the same for the most part (for invoices, reqs and POs)
  • Possibly some updates other types of data exports
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
Read full review
Well, I put it in the middle because I hope someday we will get a chance to put eProcurement suite of needed products out for RFP one day. It will not happen anytime soon due to the current administration. But I'm hopeful, and if and when it happens, SciQuest no doubt will be a strong contender.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
24/7 support. Never send you to India or some foreign country support line. Always get an answer, even if it's an answer you did not want. Always well formed conclusions/solutions to problems. They genuinely seem to care about the service they provide
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Saleslogix.
Read full review
As a supplier, SciQuest is selected by our customers - we are always confident when this selection is made. One appreciates working together with SciQuest when considering some of the issues we've encountered with other marketplace/procurement solutions: - Uneven support from staff who were less than fully trained - Non-adherence to standards such as cXML despite claims to be compliant - Difficulty garnering project resources necessary to complete an implementation - Outdated and error-prone catalog management portals
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
  • reduced sales cycle.
  • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
Read full review
  • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
  • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
Read full review
ScreenShots