ContractZen's Governance Cloud for SMBs features a board portal, entity management, contract management, virtual data rooms (VDR), and more – powered by AI. ContractZen was built to speed up operations, minimize risks, and maximize company value in due diligence situations.
$114
per year per user
Ironclad
Score8.1 out of 10
N/A
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
Pricing
ContractZen
Ironclad
Editions & Modules
Standard
$9.50
per month (billed annually) per user
Advanced
$27
per month (billed annually) per user (5 user minimum)
Custom
Contact Sales
for large organizations with over 50 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContractZen
Ironclad
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
ContractZen offers a Custom Plan designed for organizations with more than 50 users. This plan includes all features from the Advanced Plan, with the added benefit of customization to meet any specific business needs.
Pricing follows a user-based licensing model, where fees are calculated per user and billed annually.
The pricing for the Custom Plan is determined based on the size, requirements, and scope of the organization. ContractZen works with each customer to tailor the plan to best fit their governance and compliance needs.
ContractZen can be set up independently through the ContractZen website, Microsoft AppSource, or Azure Marketplace. Every new account includes a 30-day free trial with full access to all features—no credit card required.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ContractZen
Ironclad
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of ContractZen and Ironclad
Feature
ContractZen
8.3
3 Ratings
0% above category average
Ironclad
4.6
4 Ratings
57% below category average
Contract database
9.73 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Contract search
9.43 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
9.03 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Custom contract reports
5.33 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Tracking contract status
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Compliance check
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of ContractZen and Ironclad
Feature
ContractZen
-
Ratings
Ironclad
5.3
4 Ratings
40% below category average
Contract creation
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract templates
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Guided logic
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of ContractZen and Ironclad
Feature
ContractZen
-
Ratings
Ironclad
10.0
4 Ratings
19% above category average
Contract sharing
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Contract editing
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Approval process
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of ContractZen and Ironclad
ContractZen is perfect for small and medium business where the use case is to manage contracts, get alerts, and track details about contract. ContractZen has other features such as meeting management, eSignatures etc. We focus primarily on contract management and are pleased with it. ContractZen has a lot of competition and many competitors have a full contract lifecycle, which is desirable in large companies. ContractZen does not have a full contract lifecycle process. Full contract lifecycle will have request for comments/proposals, NDA, quotes, implementation proposals etc. go through multiple people, multiple layers of approval etc. and different triggers in the contract would generate different tasks for staff to manage the contract till the contract expires. Large and complex companies have needs that ContractZen may not be suitable for
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
The easy storage of contracts is important. Easier than a shared hard drive folder or a jointly administered Excel sheet, both of which we tried to use in the past.
The alerts of key contract dates is crucial. Knowing what needs to be terminated or at least considered has saved us money.
Simple signing of contracts electronically has saved us money in getting from an agreed to contract to a signed one in minutes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Ironclad is the best tool I have used to date, to manage workflow and tickets. It was very easy to use and navigate from the very first time I used it. My time is very valuable and I don't have time to sit in training sessions, simply to use a new product. I'm happy to say that I was never formally trained on Ironclad as it simply wasn't necessary.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The best part about ContractZen is that I needed no support. I had a couple questions in the last 2 years which were answered accurately within hours. Everything has worked as expected.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The capture of the new contracts is more important than the old contracts, somewhat counterintuitively. Once you start saving time using the electronic signing and retrieval, adding old material is easier. Old material additions fit our annual schedule as we've done them during periods of less administrative work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
At Gusto, where we operated on no contracts for many years, Ironclad allowed us to create a very simple process for getting approval for, and keeping records of, customized pricing on our new, high-end plan.
Wasn't part of the buying committee, but in my current role it's been heavily utilized externally for customer contracts, but also internally for employee agreements.
I don't have any actual numbers, and don't have a way to compare it to any prior e-signature setup.