Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Lytho Workflow
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Lytho Workflow is a creative project management software built specifically for the needs of creative and marketing teams. Combining elements of task and workflow management with the collaborative features of online proofing, Lytho Workflow helps teams get more content produced - faster. The key components of Lytho Workflow are Request Intake, Project Management, Review & Approval, and Reporting. From the initial creative brief, Lytho Workflow's request forms ensure…
N/A
Pricing
Contractor Foreman
Lytho Workflow
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor Foreman
Lytho Workflow
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
No two teams are alike. So why offer “one size fits all” pricing plans? They just don’t work – teams are locked out of features they need while they get features they don’t need. We do things differently. We create individual pricing based on your team’s specific needs and budget.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor Foreman
Lytho Workflow
Features
Contractor Foreman
Lytho Workflow
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
5.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.9
Ratings
15% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman works well for subcontractors and GC’s who don’t have the budget for higher-priced platforms (like Procore) but still need estimating, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and job costing in one system. For example, a 10–25 person construction company can replace separate tools (Excel, QuickBooks, text messaging, and whiteboard schedules) with Contractor Foreman and immediately improve organization and accountability.
I don't have much to compare Lytho Workflow workflow to, but I'd say it gets the job done for my small department. I can't imagine a world where we didn't have it. There are times when the software does not work as expected though. For example, if one of the marketing managers archives a request after it has been accepted, it will disappear from the request queue but remain as a job in my job queue. From there, I have to archive it again. The same goes for comments - if someone makes a comment on the request, it does not appear on the job, nor am I notified. I have to click through to the request, from the job to see those comments.
Crashes - The workflow web page crashes very frequently and I've never been able to figure out what the cause is. Refreshing the page always fixes this issue.
Proof Approvals - I wish there was a way to remove all people from the route that have approved and resend to those who haven't. Reviewers who have already approved often do not want to see future proof revisions coming through their inbox. It would be nice to have this as an option, rather than having to create a new revision and manually removing all that have approved before sending.
A more personalized dashboard - My dashboard is more geared towards someone who is requesting or reviewing jobs, rather than someone who is completing them. As a result, I rarely use this page.
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
By consolidating the requests, project management, and proofing without features we didn't need like invoicing it was an easy fit for us. We were able to quickly develop a comprehensive workflow and the gains to efficiency were immediate. Pricing was competitive (at least at the time) and the implementation was very good as well.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.