Contractor Foreman vs. Lytho Workflow

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contractor Foreman
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Lytho Workflow
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Lytho Workflow is a creative project management software built specifically for the needs of creative and marketing teams. Combining elements of task and workflow management with the collaborative features of online proofing, Lytho Workflow helps teams get more content produced - faster. The key components of Lytho Workflow are Request Intake, Project Management, Review & Approval, and Reporting. From the initial creative brief, Lytho Workflow's request forms ensure…N/A
Pricing
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.No two teams are alike. So why offer “one size fits all” pricing plans? They just don’t work – teams are locked out of features they need while they get features they don’t need. We do things differently. We create individual pricing based on your team’s specific needs and budget.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Features
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Dashboards6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.9
Ratings
15% below category average
Lytho Workflow
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Lytho Workflow
8.4
Ratings
9% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Contractor ForemanLytho Workflow
Likelihood to Recommend
Contractor Foreman works well for subcontractors and GC’s who don’t have the budget for higher-priced platforms (like Procore) but still need estimating, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and job costing in one system.
For example, a 10–25 person construction company can replace separate tools (Excel, QuickBooks, text messaging, and whiteboard schedules) with Contractor Foreman and immediately improve organization and accountability.
Read full review
I don't have much to compare Lytho Workflow workflow to, but I'd say it gets the job done for my small department. I can't imagine a world where we didn't have it. There are times when the software does not work as expected though. For example, if one of the marketing managers archives a request after it has been accepted, it will disappear from the request queue but remain as a job in my job queue. From there, I have to archive it again. The same goes for comments - if someone makes a comment on the request, it does not appear on the job, nor am I notified. I have to click through to the request, from the job to see those comments.
Read full review
Pros
  • The service is top notch. You would be hard pressed to find other options with this kind of service.
  • The ability to have your project flow through the modules makes it a breeze to use.
  • Being able to track time as well is a key feature.
Read full review
  • Project requests - can be tailored to fit your exact needs
  • Project management - can assign tasks, track time, etc.
  • Proofing - robust proofing environment that's easy for clients to learn
Read full review
Cons
  • We already heard from CF that they might implement this, but a Gantt chart available while in the estimating tab, before you submit the project
  • If you don't do things juuuusssst so, sometimes the system doesn't update or rejects what you're doing. It can be picky.
  • You have to constantly refresh using their provided button. Fixes a lot of issues and becomes second nature, but a little annoying at first.
Read full review
  • Crashes - The workflow web page crashes very frequently and I've never been able to figure out what the cause is. Refreshing the page always fixes this issue.
  • Proof Approvals - I wish there was a way to remove all people from the route that have approved and resend to those who haven't. Reviewers who have already approved often do not want to see future proof revisions coming through their inbox. It would be nice to have this as an option, rather than having to create a new revision and manually removing all that have approved before sending.
  • A more personalized dashboard - My dashboard is more geared towards someone who is requesting or reviewing jobs, rather than someone who is completing them. As a result, I rarely use this page.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Eliminated the need for our team to log into multiple systems to do their jobs which aligns to our Lean approach
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Availability was good, FUNCTIONAL availability was more spotty
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation was moderately difficult, it's the functionality and execution that are seriously lacking
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Read full review
By consolidating the requests, project management, and proofing without features we didn't need like invoicing it was an easy fit for us. We were able to quickly develop a comprehensive workflow and the gains to efficiency were immediate. Pricing was competitive (at least at the time) and the implementation was very good as well.
Read full review
Scalability
We had just 2 users
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
  • Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
  • Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
Read full review
  • Streamlines our workflows.
  • Faster time to market.
  • No more missing requests.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Contractor Foreman Screenshots

Screenshot of The client portal that lets customers to stay in the loop and know what is going on during all phases of the project.Screenshot of The custom dashboard which allows users to see the data that matters most to them.Screenshot of Stats that keep users informed to help them make use of data.Screenshot of The lead manager, that helps close deals without letting leads fall through the cracks.Screenshot of the Files & Photos screen, where making up plans can be done with Contractor Foreman.Screenshot of Time Cards, that display who is where and what they are doing.