Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Jira Work Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.
$0
Pricing
Contractor Foreman
Jira Work Management
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Free
$0
Starter - Monthly
$7.53
per month per user
Premium - Monthly
$13.53
per month per user
Starter - Annually
$22,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Premium - Annually
$40,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor Foreman
Jira Work Management
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor Foreman
Jira Work Management
Features
Contractor Foreman
Jira Work Management
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
5.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Jira Work Management
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Jira Work Management suits projects involving multiple teams, such as product development. In our case, the design, development, and QA teams use Jira to track tasks from ideation to deployment. Custom workflows and real-time updates ensure that all teams are on the same page, and the ability to link related tasks helps manage dependencies effectively.
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
As we are Atlassian users overall, this entire ecosystem is truly built from a 360 perspective. It becomes the one source of truth, and we can easily see where we are in our projects and where to emphasize focus in the upcoming period. There are some areas for minor improvements, but they are more a matter of preference rather than business necessity
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Personally I would not choose Jira Work Management for a marketing team. However, the marketing team was enveloped into the Jira Work Management instance due to use by more technical teams.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
The impact has been positive to have a roadmap available of all the work and to be more aware of the time, effort, and people that will be involved, in order to make a better decision about how our investment will look based on our benefits.