Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
iSqFt
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
ConstructConnect retains the iSqFt brand after merging the company; the platform is ConstructConnect's bidding and digital take off platform focused on helping construction contractors and companies locate bids and earn jobs.
N/A
Pricing
Contractor Foreman
iSqFt
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor Foreman
iSqFt
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor Foreman
iSqFt
Features
Contractor Foreman
iSqFt
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
iSqFt
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
iSqFt
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
iSqFt
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
iSqFt
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
iSqFt
8.7
Ratings
14% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
6.90 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
6.50 Ratings
9.70 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
6.80 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.80 Ratings
9.70 Ratings
Jobsite reports
6.90 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Document sharing
6.80 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.90 Ratings
9.70 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
6.80 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Mobile app
6.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.70 Ratings
9.70 Ratings
Checklists
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.40 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Change orders
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman works well for subcontractors and GC’s who don’t have the budget for higher-priced platforms (like Procore) but still need estimating, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and job costing in one system. For example, a 10–25 person construction company can replace separate tools (Excel, QuickBooks, text messaging, and whiteboard schedules) with Contractor Foreman and immediately improve organization and accountability.
I have noticed that many projects listed on iSqFt do not have all of the project details required to accurately bid a project. It would be nice if they had a vetting process that would required customers to upload certain documents and confirm they have certain information beofre placing the job out to bid through their platform.
Even with a "Limited Access" free account, you are able to see all the necessary files. When using it to just look at a job and download documents, this is all you should need. With more access you can see more projects that are out to bid but as a sales engineer for a manufacturer, I receive the bid requests from my contractors who are bidding there is no need to upgrade my access level.
Documents are very easy to download into a .zip file and you can pick and choose which documents you want to download for specific trades. Plus there is a specific tab for Addenda so you don't have to search through the Documents tab. The tabs also show the amount of files in each tab so you can easily stay up to date on current documents.
The Dashboard of each job shows the project general contractor and for subcontractors, responding to a bid request is as easy as clicking a button to indicate if you will bud or will not bid. This dashboard also shows location and the project description which are particularly helpful for a manufacturers rep/sales engineer that may not see the project description otherwise.
iSqFt has one major flaw that makes it a pain to use. I go there to get plans and specs. You think a company that sends you plans and specs would have a faster download speed, it takes forever to get the plans and specs. I usually find a way around iSqFt to get the plans and specs.
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
I have never had a problem with support from the iSqFt team. They are continually reaching out with tips and tricks to make using their software easier. Anytime I've had a problem - which is seldom - they have been extremely prompt with their response on how to fix it.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
iSqFt is a solid competitor in the bidding/estimating platform world but as a user, Building Connected is the front runner. iSqFt lacks on the collaboration side and isn't as easy to use and access as its competitors. Building Connected is used by most of our clients so it's easier to use because there is more information in one place.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.