Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Contentstack
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentstack
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentstack
Progress Sitefinity
Features
Contentstack
Progress Sitefinity
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Role-based user permissions
7.40 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
API
8.10 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
6.90 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
Ratings
5% above category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.10 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Admin section
7.70 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Page templates
7.70 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Library of website themes
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
6.60 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
6.80 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
6.4
Ratings
14% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Content taxonomy
7.20 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
SEO support
6.40 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Bulk management
5.70 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
6.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Community / comment management
6.10 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contentstack
Progress Sitefinity
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
It's one of the easiest to use, easiest to customize CMS system available on the Microsoft technology stack. Whenever there's an application need for user management, role-based permissions, workflows and page-content, it is simply not done to start custom development from scratch. For complex 'factory-approaches' its architectural implementation shines brightest and allows for hybrid deployments, full Azure DevOps integration and ensures security and governance are not sacrificed
The user interface is intuitive and cleanly designed.
The functionality is flexible which allows us to build our own application behind the CMS that meets business needs without being restricted by limitations in the CMS.
The service we get from our Account Manager and Technical contacts is excellent.
Once templates and custom data has been defined, it is very easy for CMS authors/editors to manage content on the site without knowledge of HTML programming.
Programming templates and custom module and extending the CMS is fairly straightforward for our development team.
Security is in the forefront, with regular updates and enhancements to the product.
Working with support is great, they have extensive knowledge on the product are able to assist if called upon.
Product utilizes .net standards, and also integrates well will standard front end tools such as jquery/bootstrap.
In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained the highest scores in our testing, and the interface has continued to develop and improve over the past three years.
We are able to prepare for large campaigns within a few days which can bel rolled our within a few clicks. This was previously never possible before we moved to Contentstack.
We now have the tools and ability to architect in a way to take advantage of SEO and drive traffic. Our blog now serves more traffic that the rest of our website. This SEO effort wasn't possible before Contentstack.
One of our KPI's for moving to headless was a faster website and we now deliver pages under our original target while serving more asset and content rich pages to visitors