Contentsquare vs. Ezoic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
Ezoic
Score 8.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Ezoic gives independent publishers a fully-automated, scientific solution for improving income from advertising as well as improving user experience. Ezoic technology is a fully automated multivariate testing platform for webmasters who might not have the time or the ability to construct multivariate tests for their site. It is designed for content publishers to improve income from advertising by automatically testing ad placement and usability metrics (Ezoic is not for ecommerce or marketing…
$0.20
No Ad, all features
Pricing
ContentsquareEzoic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Expert
20% of Ad Revenue
No Ad, all features
Enterprise
$499
per Month (No Ad, all features)
Personal
Free
No Ad, limited features
Professional
free
Ad at Bottom of Page, all features
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentsquareEzoic
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentsquareEzoic
Features
ContentsquareEzoic
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Ezoic
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Ezoic
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Ezoic
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentsquareEzoic
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentsquareEzoic
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentsquareEzoic
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
We've had a very positive experience since switching over to Ezoic on both the tech front and for programmatic revenue growth.
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
I've used a host of other ad networks in the past. None come even close to what Ezoic has.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Ezoic Screenshots

Screenshot of nullScreenshot of null