ContentProtect vs. TitanHQ DNS Filtering

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ContentProtect
Score 3.0 out of 10
N/A
ContentWatch in Salt Lake City, Utah offers ContentProtect, a web content filtering solution.N/A
TitanHQ DNS Filtering
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
WebTitan is the web security gateway and content filtering solution offered by TitanHQ.
$38
per month per 25 users (Starting Price)
Pricing
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
WebTitan Gateway
$38
per month per 25 users (Starting Price)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Best Alternatives
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
3.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentProtectTitanHQ DNS Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are looking for something relatively inexpensive to lock down specific computers, it would be a useful tool. If the computers themselves aren't too locked down, implementation and management shouldn't be too difficult.
Read full review
WebTitan DNS Filer is a great content filtering solution, this tool is recommended to use to prevent misuse of the network. WebTitan DNS Filer allows your users to automatically block the content they want at the time they want. It's very easy to use, it works very well, it's really good and affordable, plus it offers great cloud security features that are highly flexible to help protect data or meet the needs of the company you work for.
Read full review
Pros
  • The client is relatively light weight and doesn't impact other applications.
  • The client isn't easily bypassed, so the user's are kept under restrictions.
  • The configuration is relatively simple and easy to deploy.
Read full review
  • Protection
  • Filter non business content
  • Seemless usage
Read full review
Cons
  • Our primary policy is a restricted list, so that does as advertised. We had one location that had blocks based on categories (adult, illegal, etc). We continually had issues with sites getting completely blocked due to unrelated content. For example, Yahoo had a beer ad on the page, alcohol was blocked, so Yahoo became blocked for the period of time that ad was displayed. We had this happen multiple times and eventually switched to a different solution at that location.
  • I've had issues with their cloud portal not working. I don't have to edit our configuration often, but on numerous occasions, i was unable to get the configuration page to load after login, sometimes for days. The platform just wasn't stable when I needed it to be.
  • We run many of our remote rooms as frozen (after logoff they reset to the image). This works fine most times, but when content protect needs a configuration change pushed down, someone needs to go 'thaw' the computers, download the updated configuration, and re-'freeze' the computer. It would be nice if that information was just dynamic from the cloud and didn't need to be pulled down.
  • The categorization used for policies is very limited and not flexible or easily customizable.
  • I could never get the usage reporting to work.
Read full review
  • The upgrade/update process is essentially a rip and replace with the newer components.
  • Reporting could be more robust.
  • Support is responsive but many timezones away.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
At the time ContentProtect was selected, Forcepoint (Websense at the time) didn't have an inexpensive or cloud type product. The same can be said with Cisco, at that time. Recently, we have reevaluated and are going to be transitioning to Forcepoint's mobile client and removing ContentProtect from our environment. The cost is actually now less and we will be able to get both more dynamic control and also give us more detailed reporting on the traffic from clients.
Read full review
I prefer WebTitan to Webroot. The configuration was much easier and support was more responsive with WebTitan.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It was a relatively inexpensive and simple solution when we needed one relatively quickly, which is a positive. The inexpensive price has kept it in the environment.
  • The lack of reliable reporting has lead to the need for an alternate monitoring solution in a few cases. Network level reporting was used, which is a separate expense, configuration.
  • Time has been lost waiting on the portal and then troubleshooting support tickets when sites that shouldn't have been blocked have been blocked. It has resulted in changes for locations that needed dynamic category filtering as opposed to a finite list.
  • The blocking of sites based on add traffic or sub-sites (rather than just blocking that content like other solutions) has resulted in downtime during classes when those sites were listed in the lesson plan and had previously worked.
Read full review
  • The client networks it is installed on are now free of viruses
  • We are now able to offer our clients and enhanced level of security on the web
  • End users can sometimes complain that sites they use are now blocked, IE. Streaming sites etc. but this is the plan
Read full review
ScreenShots

TitanHQ DNS Filtering Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of