Confluent vs. QuickBI

QuickBI

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Confluent	Score 9.9 out of 10	N/A	Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.	$0
QuickBI	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	A data pipeline solution used to connect data rapidly. QuickBI offers over 300 data connectors and maintains a data warehouse so that users get needed data with only a few quicks. Features of the tool include: Daily data sync frequency BigQuery data warehouse 12 months to unlimited history retention Over 300 data sources Fully managed BigQuery data warehouse included in all plans Connects with BI tools (e.g. Power BI, Tableau, Looker…	$99 per month

Pricing

Confluent

QuickBI

Editions & Modules

Basic: $0
Standard: Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise: Starting at ~$1,150
per month

Basic: €99
per month
Pro: €250
per month
Enterprise: Custom

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Confluent	QuickBI
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Confluent	QuickBI

Features

Confluent

QuickBI

Streaming Analytics

Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	Confluent 9.1 Ratings 13% above category average	QuickBI - Ratings
Real-Time Data Analysis	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Low Latency	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Data Enrichment	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Confluent	QuickBI
Small Businesses	IBM Streams (discontinued) Score 9.0 out of 10	Skyvia Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Tealium Customer Data Hub Score 8.2 out of 10	Astera Data Pipeline Builder (Centerprise) Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Spotfire Streaming Score 6.6 out of 10	Control-M Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Confluent	QuickBI
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Confluent	QuickBI
Likelihood to Recommend	If your company needs to build event-driven applications, like in healthcare industry, you need to enhance interoperability, and you are seeking a reliable service with enterprise-grade support, Confluent is the best on the market you can get. Their product works great and they provide very good customer service. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Products work great. Training is available. Customer support is good. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Confluent replaced Microsoft Event Hubs in our environment and unblocked data platform services rollout globally. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots