Confluent vs. Fivetran

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluent
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$0
Fivetran
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Fivetran replicates applications, databases, events and files into a high-performance data warehouse, after a five minute setup. The vendor says their standardized cloud pipelines are fully managed and zero-maintenance. The vendor says Fivetran began with a realization: For modern companies using cloud-based software and storage, traditional ETL tools badly underperformed, and the complicated configurations they required often led to project failures. To streamline and accelerate…
$0.01
per credit
Pricing
ConfluentFivetran
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
Starter
$0.01
per credit
Standard
$0.01
per credit
Enterprise
$0.01
per credit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluentFivetran
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConfluentFivetran
Features
ConfluentFivetran
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Fivetran
-
Ratings
Real-Time Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low Latency9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Fivetran
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Fivetran
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Fivetran
6.2
Ratings
25% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Fivetran
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConfluentFivetran
Small Businesses
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 6.6 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConfluentFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConfluentFivetran
Likelihood to Recommend
If your company needs to build event-driven applications, like in healthcare industry, you need to enhance interoperability, and you are seeking a reliable service with enterprise-grade support, Confluent is the best on the market you can get. Their product works great and they provide very good customer service.
Read full review
[Fivetran is] very well suited when you are using popular and common data sources, such as the major ad platforms, and SaaS platforms such as Salesforce. If the majority of your data sources are custom internal applications or databases, may be less value as you aren't leveraging the delivered connectors.
Read full review
Pros
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
  • Simplified ETL from a wide range of data sources
  • Stable and painless data pipeline
  • Granular control over what parts of the data source are loaded
Read full review
Cons
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
  • Doesn't include support for a Kinesis stream as a data source so couldn't be used for some use cases under consideration
  • Doesn't support the use of "BEFORE DELETE" triggers
  • No support for serverless Aurora
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very easy and intuitive to setup and maintain as there usually are not that many options. Very well documented (e.g. how to setup each connector, how the schema looks like, any specific features of this connector etc.). Also the operation is intuitive, e.g. you have status pages, log pages, configuration pages etc. for each connector.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It runs pretty well and gets our data from point A to point cluster quickly enough. Honestly, it's not something I think about unless it breaks and that's pretty rare.
Read full review
Support Rating
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes. We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization. These were 2 places where Fivetran out-performed, other vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Confluent replaced Microsoft Event Hubs in our environment and unblocked data platform services rollout globally.
Read full review
  • Saved a lot of manual development days (unable to quantify)
  • Accelerated the time to add a new source to the data warehouse a lot
Read full review
ScreenShots