TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Conductrics V3 vs. Django Waffle

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Conductrics V3

    Score5.9 out of 10
    N/AConductrics offers a feature management and A/B testing platform for marketing and DevOps teams. API features include flowlets and AI capabilities - including machine learning powered feature flagging recommendations.N/A

    Django Waffle

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ADjango Waffle is an open source feature management tool for Django.N/A
    Pricing
    Conductrics V3Django Waffle
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Conductrics V3Django Waffle
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Conductrics V3Django Waffle
    Likelihood to Recommend
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Conductrics V3Django Waffle
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Conductrics
    Best suited for high tech companies, or companies with DEVs that have a lot of experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    I would recommend that engineers look to try Django Waffle for feature development within a team setting; it really streamlines flipping features on and off for testing. I think the simplicity of Django Waffle is pretty great, but it may be a limitation for those developing far more complex products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Conductrics
    • Splitting traffic
    • Customer support
    • Advanced testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • User-friendly syntax
    • Easy installation
    • Lightweight and supported, so not much in the way of bugs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Conductrics
    • Requires high technical abilities
    • Setting up reporting metrics can be tedious
    • Complex to link with other reporting sources
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Not as complex as Gutter, albeit suitable for most product needs that I've encountered
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Conductrics
    It's complex if you aren't sure what to look for, documentation is complex as well. But they have a great customer team that replies fast and is happy to help.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Conductrics
    Harder to use but better metric reporting when it comes to statistical significance and confidence reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    I found Django Waffle to work seamlessly with my Django-native codebase, and the implementation was extremely fast and intuitive. Gargoyle offers a bit more in the way of building more complicated code segments, but it's also more complex to implement. I use Django Waffle for nearly every project involving feature flipping.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Conductrics
    • Positive rev impact
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Easy to show clients different feature options without rewriting the whole codebase
    • Faster feedback loops during testing
    • Good for synchronizing team effort across the codebase
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots