Condens vs. Lyssna

Condens

Condens

4 Reviews and Ratings

Lyssna

Lyssna

16 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Condens	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Condens helps users and their teams to store, structure, and analyze user research data and share findings across an organization. Condens helps turn raw data to findings, simplify time consuming tasks, and bring structure to testing processes while maintaining a flexible workflow.	$15 per month one researcher and 12 hours per month of automated transcription
Lyssna	Score 7.5 out of 10	N/A	Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…	$0 3 seats included

Pricing

Condens

Lyssna

Editions & Modules

Individual: $15
per month one researcher and 12 hours per month of automated transcription
Team: $190
per month 3 researchers and 50 hours per month of automated transcription
Business: $450
per month includes 5 researchers and unlisted automated transcriptions
Enterprise: $1,200
per month includes 10 researchers, unlisted transcriptions, and custom terms

Free: $0
3 seats included
Basic: $89
per month 3 seats included, maximum 10 seats
Pro: $199
per month 3 seats included, maximum 15 seats
Enterprise: Contact Sales
custom seats

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Condens	Lyssna
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Discount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Condens	Lyssna

Best Alternatives
	Condens	Lyssna
Small Businesses	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10	Smartlook Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Condens	Lyssna
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Condens	Lyssna
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	I think it's well suited to any scenario where something requires feedback, whether it's exploratory feedback of current designs or validation that a new design solves a problem & additional feedback can be gathered to make it even better. I'd recommend UsabilityHub to anybody who isn't 100% sure on a design, and if they are, they need to use it to confirm that certainty. Incentivized Lee Preston Conversion Rate Optimisation Consultant Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Very fast - you can have responses in minutes. Very easy and straightforward to use. The interface is clear and intuitive. They offer suggestions for questions that are effective, which is very helpful for a first time user. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	More targeted screening A portal of all opportunities rather than email invites Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Maze has a more comprehensive reporting presentation compared to Usabilityhub. Maze's interface is clean and modern but it lacks a simple intuitive testing set found in UsabilityHub. The terminology of a Maze is slightly confusing, flow tests are integrated with only Figma, Xd, Invision, Sketch, and Marvel prototypes. The final test interface shown to users is confusing and could have been simpler like UsabilityHub. Incentivized Calvin Pedzai Senior UX Designer Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Positive - It would give us responses significantly faster than testing out a concept on a live site Positive - It allowed us to reach a wider audience for our tests (beyond our website traffic) Positive - The quick turnaround time and quality of feedback encouraged other internal units to want to test more as they saw the return quickly. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Lyssna Screenshots