ConceptDraw PROJECT is a project management tool providing a set of options to plan
and implement projects successfully, and belongs to the ConceptDraw OFFICE suite. The core features of the tool are task and resource management and reporting, along with change control. The vendor says managing multiple projects is simple due to the Gantt Chart and Multi-Project Views and shared Resource Pool. Tasks that occur on a…
N/A
Contractor Foreman
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Price varies for Individual, Commercial, Academic, Nonprofit and Government
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Contractor Foreman
Features
ConceptDraw PROJECT
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
9.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
9.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
9.4
Ratings
22% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Project & financial reporting
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
5.60 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.50 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
ConceptDraw PROJECT
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
For small and medium companies or independent departments of large companies where usually an individual plans the projects this is the best tool without all the overheads of complex software like Microsoft Project and without any privacy concerns of all online project management tools being used today. Not that convenient when you want your employees to update timesheets, etc., as everything needs to be fed into the tool by the project manager.
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
PROJECT is tightly integrated with Diagram and MindMap, the two other tools in the CD Suite. This allows me to do initial scoping in MindMap and then switch to PROJECT and go back and forth as new requirements are exposed and tasks are developed.
For projects that entail the development of mechanical or electro-mechanical systems it is necessary to develop a topology of the system. By using MindMap I can define the required elements of the system, switch to Diagram to develop an initial layout of the components of the system and then switch to PROJECT to start defining the task to develop the system. Once the system has been defined I use CD Solutions to generate presentations that incorporate the reports and dashboards generated by PROJECT.
PROJECT is cross platform (Mac and Windows). We are a Mac shop, so the ability to import Microsoft project and Visio charts and export to those formats as well saves a lot of heartburn when so many of our partners and potential customers are Windows users.
We had to spend a good amount of time to understand all the features so some interactive built-in tutorials would have made getting started easier.
The UI does not look so good in macOS Catalina Dark Mode and I often switch to light mode when working on this software.
Multiple people working on the same project at a time cannot update as there is no way to synchronize changes so we put the file in our code repo but manually co-ordinate to make sure only one of us is changing the plan at a time.
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Customer service from the ConceptDraw sales team is relatively quick and they do a good job of answering basic questions. However, the user base for ConceptDraw products is not huge so finding answers online for anything beyond basic help-file questions is difficult
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Microsoft Project is a typical Microsoft product - too much programming overhead, poor graphics, confusing and fussy interface. OmniGraffle is close to CD PROJECT but has its own fussy parts, plus it is a lot more expensive than CD PROJECT; it is in the middle between Microsoft and CD.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.