Compligo vs. MetricStream Platform

Compligo is well used for a larger organization that needs to track compliance and trainings. It has a vast library of trainings which you can assign and track completions across your organization. It can also help tracking current and previous pay plans for employees. Compligo would most likely not be appropriate for smaller organizations who do not need to track so many people. It may not also be as appropriate for companies located in states with less laws or compliances as far as training and record retention.

Incentivized

MetricStream is well suited for when you need to pull a report into Excel for further analysis. It is not good for when information needs to be entered as this is all done manually by analysts and managers. If we can implement a way to take parts of uploaded documents and have the system automatically enter the information in the designated fields in MetricStream, it would cut out lots of manual work for our department.

Incentivized

• Compliance
• Tracking Activites
• Email Notifications

Incentivized

• Easy to navigate.

Incentivized

• Support times
• Speed
• Down Times

Incentivized

• Speed/efficiency.
• Missing functionality: Uploading documents (Excel sheets) into MetricStream and being able to pull information from that form into the program.
• Improve number of outages and time that it is out for.

Incentivized

Archer is more risk-management-friendly in that it has a better interface and more room to conduct risk-related tasks and pull reports.

Incentivized

• It has made record retention easier
• It has made legacy pay plans easier to find

Incentivized

• It keeps records of all of our vendors and the corresponding documents.
• Other departments can access information on vendors.

Incentivized