TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AComodo Cybersecurity headquartered in Clifton offers Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) provides malicious file quarantine, malware protection, antivirus, and other endpoint security features.

    $4

    Per Device Per Month

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
    Pricing
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Editions & Modules
    Premium
    $4.00
    Per Device Per Month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Considered Both Products
    Comodo
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    77%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    77%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
    8.1
    2 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    8.8
    14 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology8.02 Ratings9.312 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.02 Ratings8.813 Ratings
    Centralized Management9.02 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support8.02 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Infection Remediation8.02 Ratings8.913 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management8.02 Ratings8.211 Ratings
    Malware Detection8.02 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.3
    (25 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (6 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Comodo
    It seems to be one of the best AV products that I have used. One issue that I have is with billing/invoicing and how the licenses are issued.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    It provides great web security and will protect your devices against viruses and malware when paired with other security software and hardware. For instance, we have multiple layers of security set up so if McAfee misses something then one of our other barriers will catch the infection or intrusion before it reaches the network. I would not suggest using this product as a standalone agent because I do not think it will be as effective when working by itself. The dashboard also makes it convenient to manage devices, policies, and settings from wherever you are so it's an ideal solution for any IT department to use. I would just suggest using something else as a backup so your network isn't left vulnerable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Comodo
    • Mitigates exposure to unwanted files and malware.
    • Ease of Use and Management.
    • Administrator control unlike standard antivirus purchased in the consumer/small business market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Provides high fidelity alerting.
    • Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass.
    • Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks.
    • Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Comodo
    • Stability, they could grow when it comes to updates to the client. There always seems to be complications.
    • Locking of systems. In the event of trouble, systems lock down so far that the administrator has to drive to the location where device is located, uninstall and reinstall.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • The amount of false detections especially the negative ones needed to be reduced.
    • It requires more optimization. It tends to make the PCs slower.
    • It almost doesn't have the ability to heal. This is very important as we need our sensitive data to be recoverable.
    • It doesn't have any free scanning functionality. Our users using personal machines cannot scan in case of an incident. This could be added like Malwarebytes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Comodo
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Comodo
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    The support of product was very good when we initially implemented the solution. We were getting fats replies and could see the customer approach. After a while the level of support was not following the SLA's and the replies were getting very confusing and late.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Comodo
    I was using a platform called Barkly which seemed to work well at the time. I ran a ransomware simulation against Barkly and it did not perform as well as anticipated. I began searching for another AV platform, found Comodo and decided to run the same ransomware test. Comodo [Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)] performed much better and was more effective at stopping the simulated ransomware.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation early and prevent the spread of damage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Comodo
    • Increased [efficiency]
    • Can centrally manage the endpoints
    • Mitigation of threats/vulnerabilities to the endpoint
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • From an auditing standpoint, we can show that our workstations/servers are protected.
    • Even though it cant identify more advanced/targeted malware, it is still good to identify the more obvious malware which occurs daily in my enterprise.
    • Since it can be easily deployed, the products can easily get deployed on all systems in the environment for optimal anti-malware protection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots

    Screenshot of The Monitoring workspace presents actionable endpoint threat detection without the noise.Screenshot of Automatically identify the key findings without requiring manual evaluation of each individual artifact.Screenshot of Visualization displays relationships and speeds analyst understanding.Screenshot of AI-guided investigations automatically provide answers to typical questions asked during a security incident and highlight the most relevant evidence.