Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager vs. TransUnion TruAudience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Commanders Act offers Enterprise Tag Manager, a product designed to handle website tags - and also SDKs in a single SDK container - through a management interface without the need for technical expertise.N/A
TransUnion TruAudience
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
TruAudience from TransUnion, which contains technology from Signal Tag Management and Neustar Marketing, is a solution that aims to help marketers, web analysts and agencies establish autonomy from IT development cycles, accelerate the launch of new data-driven initiatives and campaigns while significantly improving website performance.N/A
Pricing
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Features
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
TransUnion TruAudience
9.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
TransUnion TruAudience
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Tag library9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring3.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Page load times00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
6.0
Ratings
28% below category average
TransUnion TruAudience
9.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Event tracking4.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Universal data layer8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated error checking6.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile event tracking00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data distribution management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Small Businesses
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Likelihood to Recommend
If you need a single place where you can handle all the third party pixels, this is a well-suited platform. As well as if you want to keep the deployment independent from all other (and more complex) deployments driven by IT. If you need a pixel to be fired not just when the page loads, but based on user actions, you should use the events and that's pretty complex to handle.
Read full review
Signal becomes as flexible as any other tag management solution if you're able define the data layer requirements clearly to your development team. The interface is very outdated if you're coming from Google Tag Manager. You might have to know some sort of JavaScript if you plan to make changes to the properties of some tags.
Read full review
Pros
  • Creating new pixels is very easy, as well as organizing all of them, handling prioritization between different partners' pixels.
  • Defining the perimeters and constraints where the pixels need to be fired is a breeze.
  • Deploying the container and keeping track of all the modification is very well done.
  • The configuration of the deduplication rule is pretty flexible.
Read full review
  • Tag management - its very easy to place and configure 3rd party tags
  • Its easy to adjust firing rules, so your tag loads once per user or once a day.
Read full review
Cons
  • Reports. Tag Commander lacks in term of reports of what's happening. There is an additional module called Attribution Management System that gives you a lot of insights, but more basic reports to understand what has been fired will be useful.
  • Support. Tag Commander support is very low responsive. It took several days to have the first feedback and generally, it takes a lot of emails to get what you need.
  • Deduplication engine flexibility. The engine is there and it works pretty well, until you have a slightly different need. In that case you need to implement something custom in terms of implementation, reports, etc. A more flexible approach would be useful.
Read full review
  • UI was a little clunky, with the initial homepage not particularly appealing
  • Muting notifications on large chats can only be done for set, not custom, intervals
  • Notifications would frequently show up more than once, a rather annoying habit
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are deeply ingrained in BrightTag and very pleased with its performance, but there is always the possibility that another tool with features we have not considered or are even aware of may come along that makes transitioning to a new platform a worthwhile endeavor (perhaps one that integrates A/B Testing or a Personalization engine into the TMS framework)
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Based on the features and current usage. It shows some buggy pages plus the service and support is really very slow. The updates are not regular and company needs to work on that. The usability is good and reporting of tags is accurate which is the best part. The pricing of the product is good and can be used by organizations of all sizes.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Support is really slow and it takes days to resolve an issue. Plus we have to inquire regularly for the status of resolution. Company should definitely work towards that
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I believe Slack does work better than Signal for PC and office-oriented teams, but found that signal was the go-to for a rapidly growing and dismantling structure like a campaign. The Mobile interface, and the use of cell phone numbers rather than emails as a form of verification and a basis of identity makes it perfect for a campaign environment
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It let us deploy new pixels/fixes to pixels independently from the IT deployment process.
  • It let us easily turn on/off and sort the pixel execution based on partners' priority, assuring better data tracking for more important partners.
  • It provides out of the box pixel implementation for tons of partners, but really often we need to rewrite the pixel from scratch as they're not up to date.
Read full review
  • BrightTag has increased employee efficiency.
  • BrightTag has enabled us to cut down the number of times that specific pages are tagged. Tagging a site numerous times slows a page down thus decreasing the user experience.
  • Brighttag has allowed us to easy collect and house tag information, therefore increasing our customer service.
Read full review
ScreenShots