Combodo is an editor of ITSM open source solutions headquartered in France. In addition to advising and assisting companies in ITIL to improve their services and better control their information system, they offer iTop, their flagship open source ITSM software solution.
N/A
Autotask PSA
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Autotask PSA is designed as a complete IT Business Management Platform for MSPs, now from Datto (resulting from the Autotask merger with Datto in 2017).
N/A
Pricing
iTop
Datto Autotask PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
iTop
Autotask PSA
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
iTop
Datto Autotask PSA
Features
iTop
Datto Autotask PSA
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
iTop
9.7
Ratings
18% above category average
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expert directory
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service restoration
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service tools
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
9.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
iTop
9.3
Ratings
12% above category average
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Configuration mangement
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
9.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
I think that it is very well suited for smaller companies who want a help desk stack with a monitoring integration like Zabbix for a completely open-source stack. I do not think that it is particularly well suited for large organizations where more robust helpdesks are available. ServiceNow may be a better option for a larger organization.
In my opinion, Datto Autotask is exceptionally complicated to set up, manage, and use on a daily basis. I would think the target market for this product would be someone managing a team of 20 - 50 people, possibly more. In my experience, for it to run properly you will need to dedicate at least half an FTE to running this product in an organization of that size per month. I would not recommend it for companies with less than 10 people or for companies that value quick communication with their clients. I would not recommend it for companies using Datto's RMM product. The integration exists, but it is clearly a bolt-on. They were not developed together and they are slow to talk to each other. Frequently you cannot add details from RMM sessions into the PSA without manually copying the ticket number, and if the ticket is more than a week old, then you can't even find it with the ticket number.
AutoTask allows for us to receive and work support tickets very easily. We've setup various 'Issue Types' that in turn are bound to SLAs ensuring that items are worked appropriately as they are received.
The automation that AutoTask allows for with regards to various emails/requests coming through has been great. It allows for us to not have to constantly "watch the queue" as when a critical item arrives the appropriate persons are notified and can work it.
I feel that the management of AutoTask for both user setup, and various automations is done well. We're able to copy settings as needed, and create templates for multiple items.
Datto Autotask PSA is a full featured product that can do almost anything you need. There is a significant learning curve to get started which requires several hours spent in product training. Additionally, several hours / days are needed to get clients imported, contracts configured, and integrations implemented. Once the setup and user training is complete, the product is very functional, but it's imperative to not get overwhelmed when starting out.
Each member of [the] IT team members can define their control screens with the information that is relevant to them. The lifecycle of the tickets or the list of tasks to perform for the achievement of a process can be set to fit each organization. Gives users a simple way to formulate intervention requests and to follow progress.
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there aren't a bunch of superfluous and unneeded alerts. Instead, it only alerts for things that you specify that you want. Alerts aside, for the PSA/CRM, I don't have much to compare it to as Autotask was the first PSA we tried. It's hard to imagine a PSA having more features or doing a better job than Autotask.