Cofense Vision vs. Trellix Intelligent Sandbox

It is well suited in environments where there is a high mail traffic to handle. [Cofense] Vision basically journals the exchange server and keeps a copy of the mail received in the environment. Really beneficial to revoke and quarantine the mail reported by one user, but footprint is there in other mailboxes as well. Less appropriate in the cases where there is no proper segregation of duties within the organization. As it is possible to see contents of the mail. Only authorized personnel should be able to use it.

Incentivized

It is suited for people who are looking to secure their PCs from malware attacks. There is also email threat prevention where it will detect unwanted mails which come through our inbox. The sandbox feature comes in handy when you want to test new applications that will prevent it spreading to multiple systems in an environment if it is malicious. It has good customer support for all our technical queries. Since pricing is quite high, small-scale organizations can't afford it.

Incentivized

• AutoQuaratine prevents in advance and eliminates possible malicious emails from users' inboxes.
• [Cofense Vision] optimizes protection against any phishing attack.
• It is simple, friendly and easy to use.
• [Cofense Vision provides] super detailed analysis reports.

Incentivized

• Automatic updates.
• Runs in the background.

Incentivized

• Sometimes its system clashes and it stops working all the way and disturbs working.
• Some of our important emails went missing and we can find them in Cofense Vision and it needs proper checking in order to retrieve email.
• There are no other cons I could think of as I have not encountered any other so far.

Incentivized

• handling exceptions if you could centralize it would be nice.
• In the same way, it could improve how the logs are seen, the board is very rough.
• At the level of final use, there is no way that it can visualize the time it takes for a scan to be carried out remotely.

Incentivized

Personally, I have only called our internal IT team about needing changes to permissions, not McAfee itself, but our IT team can make the changes though it seems to take them longer than I would think it needs to take. As someone who administers a different program, with different permissions, I would feel they should be able to make the exceptions faster and easier.

Incentivized

Agari Phishing Defense is extremely easy to use software, with an immediate response capacity in the presence of phishing, but Cofense Vision is a tool with flexible implementation and a great capacity to adapt to the needs of each company, as well as having a high level of integration with other software and its great capacity to carry out searches, detection and give rapid responses to incidents that is why we have chosen Cofense Vision.

Incentivized

McAfee brand is used, mcafee antivirus scan, mcafee drive encryption, mcafee DLP, mcafee cloud proxy. He Kaspersky at the corporate level and used his admin dashboard is a bit rough. I recommend mcafee since the graphical environment is very friendly with the administrator. We selected it because at the administration level it is more comfortable, support for end users is very easy, the administration console can create roles and segregate permissions.

Incentivized

• Many Phishing attacks are identified and prevented in an instant.
• Classification of activity helps analysts search and find which emails pose a larger threat.
• User interface and learning is simple and easy to use.

Incentivized

• Its high pricing is unsuitable for our business.
• We no longer stress about any undesired invasion.
• Our data is safe and sound.

Incentivized