TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cofense Vision vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cofense Vision

    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Cofense Vision stores emails offline and provides threat hunting analytics. Cofense Vision allows the user to search and quarantine emails in minutes — across an entire organization, and is designed to provide threat hunting at speed.N/A

    Splunk Enterprise Security

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/ASplunk Enterprise Security is an analytics-driven SIEM that helps to combat threats with actionable intelligence and advanced analytics at scale.N/A
    Pricing
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Considered Both Products
    Cofense
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    99%
    Would buy again
    100 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    84 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    95 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    74 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    84 Answers
    Features
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Cofense Vision and Splunk Enterprise Security
    Feature
    Cofense Vision
    -
    Ratings
    Splunk Enterprise Security
    8.4
    102 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.3100 Ratings
    Correlation00 Ratings8.699 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.5100 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.3101 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings7.896 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings9.2102 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings7.996 Ratings
    Data integration/API management00 Ratings8.498 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.795 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.596 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.087 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.695 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings9.2101 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    8.9
    (103 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (100 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cofense VisionSplunk Enterprise Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Cofense
    • AutoQuaratine prevents in advance and eliminates possible malicious emails from users' inboxes.
    • [Cofense Vision] optimizes protection against any phishing attack.
    • It is simple, friendly and easy to use.
    • [Cofense Vision provides] super detailed analysis reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Cofense
    • Its cost can be somewhat high when it comes to a small business, so it is perfectly suited to medium or large companies.
    • It can throw problems when it comes to migrating said tool in the different versions of an email.
    • Its configuration is simple, but it is important to fully understand its operation to give adequate responses to possible threats.
    • It would be ideal if it could be integrated with your platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I'm not an ES user, but, in my implementation I usually try to prevent all service stops to guarantee High availability to the final customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    ES requires a very performant infrastructure: if it has it's performant, otherwise not. I had situation with a very performant infrastructure and I didn't notized that it was a distributed architecture, it seemed that there ware few data on my PC, othewise I experienced less performant infrastructures with less performaces.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It's good when it's responsive, but I've had times where I had to wait quite a while for a response. But these are typically the exceptions rather than the rule. When you do get a response it is always well-informed and appropriate. I would say they've been trending better over time with this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I experienced only on-line training, but the trainers were very professional and competent. Maybe it could be more useful if they also have an experience in projects because sometimes they didn't have a real project experience to communicate to the students. Anyway, it was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself, aven if I have more than 10 years of Splunk activity experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself. The only problem was that, when I worked with the Splunk Professional Services, I found some difference between the training contents and the information from PS. In addition is required a long experience on Splunk Enterprise for the data ingestion part, in other words I'm able to work with ES because I'm worling on Splunk since 11 years, otherwise I'd some problem.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It's a fantatic product and it was very useful the presence of Splunk Professional Services for the Design Phase and the final Health Check.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cofense
    Apple of Discord is the pricing as we were looking for an email security tool in reasonable pricing and Barracuda was undoubtedly efficient in action and was compatible with our business but it was highly expensive and then we made up our mind for another tool and Cofense Vision was offering almost the same as Barracuda but cheaper.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    for my exterience, unit pricing and billing frequency are correct. As I already said, I hint to have more discount flexibility, expecially with new customers, because there are competitors less expensive and very aggressive that are dangerous. In addition the possibility to don't pay the license for the development period could be a very interesting feature for the final customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I had a fantastic experience with Splunk Professional Services: they worked with us in our last SON project (a SOC migration for a very large customer) and helped to build a multi tenent environment even if ES isn't a multi tenant platform. Th Splunk PS was a very professional and competent people, he is italian and was able to speak with our italian customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cofense
    • Many Phishing attacks are identified and prevented in an instant.
    • Classification of activity helps analysts search and find which emails pose a larger threat.
    • User interface and learning is simple and easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots