CodeStream vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CodeStream | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | The vendor states CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside an IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on a team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using preferred keybindings and environments. Use a simple shortcut to highlight code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are… | $10 Per Seat / Per Month |
Veracode | Score8.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| CodeStream | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Enterprise tier includes admin console with advanced usage analytics, realtime merge conflict detection, API access, Single sign-on (SSO), premium support and success services | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CodeStream | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 121 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 85 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 125 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 72 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Implementation went as expected 95 Answers | |
| CodeStream | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score10 out of 10 | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score10 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score10 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CodeStream | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.3 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 6.4 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 5.5 |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.9 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| CodeStream | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | CodeStream Screenshots | Veracode Screenshots |








