CoderPad vs. Codility

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoderPad
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Codility
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Codility is a recruitment tool for tech recruiters, aimed at automating the recruitment process by pre-screening candidates for the technical skills required for the position in question. By only offering interviews to the most qualified candidates, the hiring process is faster and easier for recruiters and candidates alike.N/A
Pricing
CoderPadCodility
Editions & Modules
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoderPadCodility
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$15/interview for overagesContact the vendor directly for a custom pricing quote based on the scale of your hiring needs.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoderPadCodility
User Ratings
CoderPadCodility
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoderPadCodility
Likelihood to Recommend
We were looking for tech guy (coder) for an idea and rather than going through the whole process of finding and hiring the people we opted for CoderPad. It did the job very well in filtering out people who were fit and not fit for our role. This way our time was saved.
Read full review
Codility is a great tool to use for candidates' technical assessments of our selection processes. It is easy for recruiters to use, friendly to the people that are tested, and easy to manage. The test report is great. As a recruiter with limited technical knowledge, I wish it could be easier for me to build a test by myself (understand the tasks easier - there could be a bigger description or training for us) without depending on the hiring managers who aren't always available. Also, most times the invitation e-mail to take the test ends up in the candidates' spam box.
Read full review
Pros
  • Option of proctored/unproctored assessment
  • Uniform structure of assessment
  • Variety of problem sets to choose from
Read full review
  • Run Tech exams for remote candidates.
  • Allow Exam planning.
  • Let managers easily check the exams.
  • Make sure candidates can't cheat during the exam.
Read full review
Cons
  • Occasionally IDE parsing of code will mark correct code incorrect and will update late
  • Listing functions callable by a given object is sometimes slow
  • Could provide a small non-login required demo site for interviewees so they will be more used to the development environment before interviews
Read full review
  • Could describe the tests easier for layman to understand
  • Could update tasks more often to prevent copies
Read full review
Usability
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Coderpad provides many features which HackerRank doesn't, such as Candidate comparison, 24*7 customer support. It also provides integration with several other applications such as greenhouse, workable, Smartrecruiters, Linkedin Talent Hub, Prelude, Okta, etc. Also, It's free for candidates who want to gather credibility by putting up their scores on the profile.
Read full review
This was the best that integrated with our TA system (Greenhouse) and we got positive recommendations. At a time we considered other talent acquisition systems, such as Success Factors, the integration was insufficient. Other than that, the talent acquisition Director was bios, based on previous experience, so as IT, we didn't have much of discovery or selection to make.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Simplifies interview process and helps field candidates better by seeing how they function in a coding environment
Read full review
  • Positive impact: helped in tech hiring
  • Overall quality has increased
Read full review
ScreenShots