TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Coda by Grammarly

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ACoda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases.

    $0

    per month

    TeamGantt

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ATeamGantt is a project management solution built to provide users with gantt chart software through online deployment.

    $59

    per month per manager

    Pricing
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Pro
    $10.00
    per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
    Team
    $30.00
    per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Pro
    $59
    per month per manager
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsWith Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise20% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Considered Both Products
    Grammarly
    No answer on this topic
    TeamGantt
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Coda by Grammarly and TeamGantt
    Feature
    Coda by Grammarly
    -
    Ratings
    TeamGantt
    8.4
    10 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
    Resource Management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Gantt Charts00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Document Management00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Email integration00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Coda by Grammarly and TeamGantt
    Feature
    Coda by Grammarly
    -
    Ratings
    TeamGantt
    8.8
    4 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Invoicing00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (25 ratings)
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    9.3
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Coda by GrammarlyTeamGantt
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Grammarly
    Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    TeamGantt is wonderful for organizing long and short term projects that have lots of tasks and or people involved. I love that it's "in the cloud" so I can manage no matter where I am or what device I'm using. There is a mobile app that is quite easy to use and sized nicely for people who have trouble reading small/fine print. I find it to be a well-suited tool for ongoing projects where the tasks change weekly - I use it for my newsletter planning. You can assign and label tasks which is super convenient for me and my Team. All through the week we are making changes and suggestions in TeamGantt and as we get closer to publication day we mark the stories and objects as done so we know we will finish everything before our deadline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Grammarly
    • Flexibility. It's easy to get started on a small scale, but add more complex organization strategies as needed.
    • Integrations. It's simple to ingest data from sources like Zapier for time-saving automations.
    • Useful components. View table data across different formats like cards or custom detail views.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    • In TeamGantt, clients can remark on any undertaking and keep their visits inside the errands.
    • Reports can likewise be connected to any undertaking. Clients can channel the errands by the due date and what their identity is relegated to, and they can change over Gantt graphs into PDFs.
    • The arrangement is accessible for each client each month's membership premise and offers support using telephone and email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Grammarly
    • It takes getting used to in terms of how the formulas per column is implemented, in contrast to how we build tables in Excel. For organization/team purchase, it would be worth considering having a training for the core team of users. Right now, we do a lot of self-learning.
    • Inability to email charts or image without these objects being hosted on a third party. The community has been great in providing workarounds but it would be much more convenient to be able to have such ability natively.
    • APAC Support. I'm based in Malaysia, due to timezone differences, even with a livechat implemented, the support for each step and conversation takes up to 24 hours per response. Having some hours covered in our timezone would greatly improve customer support experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    • Task assignment matrix is a bit clunky. It's a bit difficult to see distribution of work for each assignee, but not impossible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Grammarly
    Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Grammarly
    There is a little bit of a learning curve on where to point and click to add in different elements and make edits. But it is still very manageable once you get the hang of it. I do still have some issues with some of my connected pages updating each other when I don't want them to sync. So I'll end up editing one page, and it will make the same edits on another page.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Grammarly
    So far in the past year, we haven't had situations that Coda has gone down for us which is great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Grammarly
    We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Grammarly
    Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    I never interacted with them. That, in itself, I feel represents their quality. They made the resources available to me so that when I started to have a question, the answer was either right there for me, or easy to figure out without any trouble. So, I never felt the need!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Grammarly
    I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Grammarly
    While all of the products listed have great features and platforms, there was always one thing missing from them that I would need to get from another application. Coda was the first one we used that really combined some of the best parts of those products and allowed us to use it in one place. I also appreciate the flexibility of creating your own framework and workflow, unlike in other tools where you have to follow how they capture data and organize projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    Our team uses ClickUp for task management. ClickUp has a Gantt chart feature, but it's based solely on the tasks we create in ClickUp, so in order to create a client-facing chart, we'd have to completely change the way we assign tasks to our internal team. We use TeamGantt for the sole purpose of creating project plans and viewing project statuses at-a-glance. You might be able to use it for task management, but we don't.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Grammarly
    I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Grammarly
    • Increased insight for all stakeholders involved--both in terms of overview and details
    • Better grip on issues and escalations--reduced friction, confusion, and higher clarity on status, next actions, and ownership.
    • Reduced time required by those who need to maintain all information. Record (a detail) once and use multiple times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TeamGantt
    • TeamGantt has had an overall incredible return on investment.
    • In the past, we have tracked strategies/projects manually (MS Excel, etc.). Having a tool like TeamGantt has improved our efficiency greatly.
    • The ability to see where a project stands (intra-department) at-a-glance has improved our ability to observe statuses.
    • TeamGantt has definitely helped remind me to drive on projects that would normally have gone "stale."
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Coda by Grammarly Screenshots

    Screenshot of One unified surface means ideas aren’t limited to a file type. A project doesn’t have to be split across tabs of documents, spreadsheets, and apps.Screenshot of Packs are a version of integrations or plug-ins. They connect the  doc to the apps in use every day, so as to pull live data in or push updates out automatically.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop templates provide a quick-start shortcut to commonly used templates like Upvote/Downvote, To-Do List, and Team Sentiment Tracker.Screenshot of Slice, dice, and chop data using Views. A View is a mirror of data that can be tailored to unique needs, all while staying connected to the source.Screenshot of When accessing the doc from a mobile device, it should feel like an app. Doc pages become tabs, buttons become swipe actions and doc notifications become push notifications.Screenshot of The Doc Gallery contains docs self-published by the Coda community. These published docs have a webpage-like interface and have varying levels of interactivity like view, play or edit. Find and share tools, templates, tiny apps, interactive handbooks, and anything else that can be built in Coda.