TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Coda by Grammarly vs. Function Point Productivity Software

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Coda by Grammarly

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ACoda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases.

    $0

    per month

    Function Point Productivity Software

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AFunction Point is a project management software built specifically for ad agencies, design studios, and marketing departments.

    $46

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Pro
    $10.00
    per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
    Team
    $30.00
    per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Agency (30-49)
    $46
    per month per user
    Studio (10-29)
    $48
    per month per user
    Boutique (5-9)
    $52
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Call for Pricing
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsWith Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterpriseCustomers save 11% on annual billing. Demo’s available.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Considered Both Products
    Grammarly
    No answer on this topic
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Coda by Grammarly and Function Point Productivity Software
    Feature
    Coda by Grammarly
    -
    Ratings
    Function Point Productivity Software
    7.9
    6 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Resource Management00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
    Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Team Collaboration00 Ratings7.96 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.25 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
    Document Management00 Ratings5.45 Ratings
    Email integration00 Ratings7.24 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings6.34 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management00 Ratings8.15 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings8.56 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Coda by Grammarly and Function Point Productivity Software
    Feature
    Coda by Grammarly
    -
    Ratings
    Function Point Productivity Software
    9.0
    6 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.66 Ratings
    Invoicing00 Ratings9.66 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.8 out of 10
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Microsoft To Do
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (25 ratings)
    7.9
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    9.7
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Coda by GrammarlyFunction Point Productivity Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Grammarly
    Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    Well suited in:
    • Project management from estimate creation to final billing.
    • Time tracking per job.
    • Delegating tasks internally (and externally if choosing to use this feature).
    • Creative agency environments where jobs have many moving parts and employees working on.
    • Customer contact information management.
    • Internal creative collaboration (brainstorming).
    • Management oversight allowing team leads to review hours logged per employee to each job.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Grammarly
    • Flexibility. It's easy to get started on a small scale, but add more complex organization strategies as needed.
    • Integrations. It's simple to ingest data from sources like Zapier for time-saving automations.
    • Useful components. View table data across different formats like cards or custom detail views.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    • Time tracking - like several time tracking solutions, FP uses a clock that will track in real time so that you do not need to remember how long you worked on a project to input later.
    • Dashboards - I love FP's dashboards that let me track my personal utilization, the utilization of my team members and all of my open tasks.
    • Reporting - FP's reports provide insight organization-wide into how we are doing and where we (as an organization) are spending our time. As with any reporting, though, it is important to manage the cleanliness of your data to make the reporting useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Grammarly
    • It takes getting used to in terms of how the formulas per column is implemented, in contrast to how we build tables in Excel. For organization/team purchase, it would be worth considering having a training for the core team of users. Right now, we do a lot of self-learning.
    • Inability to email charts or image without these objects being hosted on a third party. The community has been great in providing workarounds but it would be much more convenient to be able to have such ability natively.
    • APAC Support. I'm based in Malaysia, due to timezone differences, even with a livechat implemented, the support for each step and conversation takes up to 24 hours per response. Having some hours covered in our timezone would greatly improve customer support experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    • Function Point often provided reports that were inaccurate due to bad calculations. The support team would work with us to troubleshoot these issues, but the fact remained that calculations were wrong.
    • Function Point was purchased by a new parent company that increased prices over their nearest, superior, competitor, pricing themselves out of the market.
    • Function Point's interface is dated, as is its code base.
    • New features are being implemented not as software revisions or upgrades, but as new for-pay features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Grammarly
    Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Grammarly
    There is a little bit of a learning curve on where to point and click to add in different elements and make edits. But it is still very manageable once you get the hang of it. I do still have some issues with some of my connected pages updating each other when I don't want them to sync. So I'll end up editing one page, and it will make the same edits on another page.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Grammarly
    So far in the past year, we haven't had situations that Coda has gone down for us which is great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Grammarly
    We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Grammarly
    Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    • Receive weekly emails from FP team about new features being added and webinars to review.
    • Always extremely reliable and quick to respond with answers to questions or concerns.
    • Includes function for their clients to make recommendations to their platform.
    • Allows for customization on the back end to provide the best solution/functions for each client.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Grammarly
    I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Grammarly
    While all of the products listed have great features and platforms, there was always one thing missing from them that I would need to get from another application. Coda was the first one we used that really combined some of the best parts of those products and allowed us to use it in one place. I also appreciate the flexibility of creating your own framework and workflow, unlike in other tools where you have to follow how they capture data and organize projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    Workamajig was NOT a good fit, after over a year of back-end setup. FunctionFox didn't have the financial integration capabilities we needed, but we used it for years and were happy with the service and support. FunctionPoint brought together the 30,000-foot view of the projects and resources with a simplified process for getting day-to-day jobs into the queue, which was essential for our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Grammarly
    I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Grammarly
    • Increased insight for all stakeholders involved--both in terms of overview and details
    • Better grip on issues and escalations--reduced friction, confusion, and higher clarity on status, next actions, and ownership.
    • Reduced time required by those who need to maintain all information. Record (a detail) once and use multiple times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Function Point Productivity Software Inc.
    • We have a much more timely and accurate sense of our financials since switching to FunctionPoint
    • Our team is more efficient at tracking time, and we are much more able to track resources and profitability
    • Our accounting manager is able to use Quick Books in a much more efficient manner than previously
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Coda by Grammarly Screenshots

    Screenshot of One unified surface means ideas aren’t limited to a file type. A project doesn’t have to be split across tabs of documents, spreadsheets, and apps.Screenshot of Packs are a version of integrations or plug-ins. They connect the  doc to the apps in use every day, so as to pull live data in or push updates out automatically.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop templates provide a quick-start shortcut to commonly used templates like Upvote/Downvote, To-Do List, and Team Sentiment Tracker.Screenshot of Slice, dice, and chop data using Views. A View is a mirror of data that can be tailored to unique needs, all while staying connected to the source.Screenshot of When accessing the doc from a mobile device, it should feel like an app. Doc pages become tabs, buttons become swipe actions and doc notifications become push notifications.Screenshot of The Doc Gallery contains docs self-published by the Coda community. These published docs have a webpage-like interface and have varying levels of interactivity like view, play or edit. Find and share tools, templates, tiny apps, interactive handbooks, and anything else that can be built in Coda.