Coda by Grammarly vs. EGroupware
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coda by Grammarly | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Coda, acquired by Grammarly in early 2025, is a template-based document creation and collaboration solution, supporting a variety of use cases. | $0 per month |
EGroupware | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | EGroupware is more than a standard groupware: Web-based: allows device-independent access via web browser Configurable and customisable masks. User-defined fields Information can be used as variables in document generation or in e-mails Generated documents can be edited in online office, sent by e-mail or shared via file sharing Permissions on modules, functions, data, ressources, other user data, to ensure secure data Access can beโฆ | N/A |
| Coda by Grammarly | EGroupware | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise | There are pricing models for active users and concurrent logins. In addition, the prices are scaled according to the number of users and special agreements (also flat rates) are possible. Rocket.Chat is offered at an annual flat rate. Collabora Online per user. Discounts for NGOs, schools and universities. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Coda by Grammarly | EGroupware | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
94% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Coda by Grammarly | EGroupware | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Flock Score9.1 out of 10 | Flock Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Microsoft Viva Engage Score7.8 out of 10 | Microsoft Viva Engage Score7.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Keep Score9.9 out of 10 | Google Keep Score9.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Coda by Grammarly | EGroupware | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.8 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | - |
| Configurability | 8.2 | - |
| Ease of integration | 4.5 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.3 | - |
| Coda by Grammarly | EGroupware | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Coda by Grammarly Screenshots | EGroupware Screenshots |









