CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.
N/A
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$0
per month per user
Pricing
CMiC Construction Platform
Wrike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CMiC Construction Platform
Wrike
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CMiC Construction Platform
Wrike
Features
CMiC Construction Platform
Wrike
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
Wrike
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
8.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.80 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
Negotiations often involve long timelines and multiple rounds of discussion. Wrike allows us to assign clear ownership, track due dates, and monitor progress so that nothing stalls or gets lost. Redlines, proposals, and finalized agreements can be stored and shared within Wrike, reducing reliance on scattered email chains and ensuring everyone is working from the most current version.
The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
different views to accommodate different users workflow
predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
Entering a code of the vendor instead of the company name while recording an invoice takes time and seems counter intuitive
Editing an invoice created through Image Management on the AP side is limited to description and address field. When changing the rest (invoice# or a date or an amount) - the whole trace of who entered/submitted/approved disappears. The way it works now is: deleting an invoice from the batch, locating it through Registry/invoice search, unsubmitting it, making changes, submitting, adding back to batch - time consuming
In Multiple distribution pop up window, when entering a new invoice, I'd make the field "Company" to be autofilled once "Job" is entered. It takes time to memorize what job number belongs to what company.
There is only web version available and it is limited compare to a desktop client. For instance I can only make one change at a time and save it. Multiple changes don't get saved in one click
For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
Importing.
Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
I can't even begin to imagine the thought of going through another software conversion so I do not think I would even consider switching at this point. It does everything we need it to do so I don't have any reason to recommend not renewing at this point in time
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
I love the way task management is designed within Wrike. The full overview, followed by sequential updates, really works for us - this way, we don't need to go into individual people's work subtasks to find what's happening with a project. That's very useful from a project management perspective. The to-do feature also lets everyone access info in one place.
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
We've had so many questions during the establishment of Wrike for our team, and the Wrike support team has exceeded our expectations. Our team is naturally curious, and the Wrike support team has always been willing to hold conversations about how we can make an idea work, to show us hidden features that delight us, and to help us plan ways to build out projects efficiently. They meet our questions with multiple solutions and best practices
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
Wrike has significantly enhanced our workflow and productivity, ensuring accuracy and efficiency meet high standards. Our work now reflects professionalism and top quality. Other departments have taken notice of how organized we are thanks to Wrike, and we take great pride in our work—all made possible by this platform
We've knocked days, if not weeks, off of our timeline to getting invoices paid using Image manager and workflow approvals.
Because we have real time cost and budget information all in one place, we've knocked a day or two off of each project for their monthly forecasts, and we're much more consistent and accurate than we were before CMiC.
Because we pull a large chunk of project information into our BI reports, we've never had better visibility into projects and their potential issues. We're able to compare current project progress with past similar projects to determine if we are going to have an issue before it actually happens.
Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.