Cloudflyer vs. Qlik Replicate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudflyer
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflyer automated data replication, migration and backup technologies - through strategic partnerships with emerging cloud platforms like Wasabi, Storj and Iron Cloud - power new business growth for IT solution providers, enabling their clients’ digital transformation, data analytics and data protection initiatives.
$0.03
one-time fee per GB
Qlik Replicate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
Pricing
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Editions & Modules
All other clouds (non AWS, Azure, or GCP)
$0.03
one-time fee per GB
AWS, Azure, GCP
$0.06
one-time fee per GB
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Best Alternatives
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Small Businesses
HYCU
HYCU
Score 8.9 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Matillion
Matillion
Score 7.8 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle GoldenGate
Oracle GoldenGate
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CloudflyerQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Qlik Replicate brought a great experience with respect to the ease of implementation and great UI. We had a software that was a blackbox for the team and was very hard to maintain. Qlik Replicate implementation helped us avoid dependency on one resource.
  • Global transformation and in-built functions are what I like in our project.
  • You can customize the conversion/transformation using a JSON file generated by Qlik Replicate, and it is very convenient.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of