Cloudera Manager vs. Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Cloudera Manager is a management application for Apache Hadoop and the enterprise data hub, from Cloudera. Its automated wizards let users quickly deploy a cluster, no matter what the scale or the deployment environment, complete with intelligent, system-based default settings.
$0.04
Hourly rate
Kubernetes
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Kubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A
Pricing
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Editions & Modules
Data Hub
$0.04/CCU
Hourly rate
Data Engineering
$0.07/CCU
Hourly rate
Data Warehouse
$0.07/CCU
Hourly rate
Operational Database
$0.08/CCU
Hourly rate
Flow Management on Data Hub
$0.15/CCU
Hourly rate
Machine Learning
$0.17/CCU
Hourly rate
DataFlow
$0.30/CCU
Hourly rate
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is per Cloudera Compute Unit (CCU) which is a combination of Core and Memory. CCU prices shown for each service are estimates and may vary depending on actual instance types. The prices reflected do not include infrastructure cost, networking costs, and other related costs which will vary depending on the services you choose and your cloud service provider.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Features
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Manager
-
Ratings
Kubernetes
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Azure Data Lake Storage
Azure Data Lake Storage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudera ManagerKubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudera Manager is well suited for environments and deployments where the administrator user base is not well versed in the Apache Hadoop ecosystem or the Linux command line interface.
Read full review
Along with all the best features and support by k8s, the automatic container scheduling to worker nodes and also self-healing containers which is what I like the most. On the other side, when I was installing the k8s cluster on CentOS 8, it was quite difficult for me, but never mind it is working as we expected and it is a one-time effort. Especially, in my case, there are more than 7 application containers required to run and communicate with each other, so for us, Kubernetes is an optimal solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Cloudera Manager has an easy to use web GUI. You can start and stop cluster and services. It will start and stop services in a cluster in the right order. You can monitor the cluster, services, and physical host hardware as well.
  • Cloudera Manager has an easy to use API that allows us to create scripts to automate deployment process.
  • Cloudera Manager has an option to add additional services that you could manage via the web GUI.
Read full review
  • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
  • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
  • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
Read full review
Cons
  • Support for third-party Python APIs within Cloudera Manager extension framework
  • Providing more reporting/logging functionality as part of the open source distribution
  • Support for the latest RHEL versions sooner in the release lifecycle
Read full review
  • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
  • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
  • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It meets all my customer's needs.
Read full review
The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have not used any competitors, such as Hortonworks, because Cloudera Manager just works and meets all my customer's needs. I only have deployed Hadoop using command line, which is not easy to use and manage.
Read full review
As I said earlier also - - K8s manage the workloads better as compared to OpenStack in terms of reliability, observability & reachability. - K8s is not limited to only a single networking or storage solution as compared to OpenStack. - Networking (which is a key concept) is much simpler in K8s as compared to OpenStack. - It is possible to upgrade your applications without downtime in K8s but in OpenStack, you either have to divert the traffic or face an outage because you have to delete the whole stack & then recreate it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cloudera Manager has allowed our organization to deploy Apache Hadoop to operations quicker and with less training versus using the command line exclusively.
  • Increased employee efficiency.
  • Increased product adoption.
Read full review
  • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
  • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
Read full review
ScreenShots