Clarive vs. Spinnaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Clarive
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Clarive, from multi-national Clarive Software headquartered in Madrid, is a release management platform.N/A
Spinnaker
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Spinnaker is an open source continuous delivery platform with a range of cluster management and deployment management features, originally developed at Netflix.N/A
Pricing
ClariveSpinnaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClariveSpinnaker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ClariveSpinnaker
Best Alternatives
ClariveSpinnaker
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ClariveSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ClariveSpinnaker
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Spinnaker is a strong solution for Continuous Deployment being able to manage enormous environments in an easy way. Even Spinnaker being able to manage environments based on cloud instances (ec2 for example) I believe it is more suitable for containerized environments. Mainly in Kubernetes where it excels as a reliable and safe tool
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The immutable way of deployment is one of its greatest advantages.
  • We have a strict policy to restock our instances with new images very frequently and this can be done very seamlessly via Spinnaker
  • Rollback/ resize of clusters is one of the coolest features of Spinnaker.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Integration with external authentication mechanism is not that simple.
  • Its configuration is made by a external tool (halyard). Would be better if we could configure it by using its own frontend.
  • Its user interface is some times a bit confusing.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
• Pipeline Expressiveness • Self-Service/Override • Visibility of Client Teams • Operability of Client Teams - • High-Quality Integrations (AWS, IHP, Google) • Extensibility – (Ability to add code) • The maturity of Deployment Process • Speed/Ease of Onboarding
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • It's open source!
  • RPM based deployments can be scripted at Maven file itself , so very easy!
  • RPM based deployments bundles all code and configs together, so awesome!
Read full review
ScreenShots