Cisco TrustSec vs. Cisco XDR

• Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
• Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
• Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
• Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.

Incentivized

It is well suited for environments that have a large mix of Cisco products and popular software packages. As a SaaS application it doesn't require much for a local footprint but at the same time won't work in an environment that requires your security tools to store data or run locally.

Incentivized

• Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
• Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.

Incentivized

• Providing visibility for threat risks
• Detecting holes in the network that have vulnerabilites
• Flagging ddos events and kicking off an incident response

Incentivized

• Help and solutions if needed, support

Incentivized

• XDR can improve with more integrations
• XDR can be improved with more programmability for the end user
• XDR can be improved with more options to mitigate events

Incentivized

Cisco XDR is great for companies that primarily run Cisco and provides a more seamless integration than Qradar both in terms of identify risks and mitigating them. Cisco XDR also provides insight through Cisco Talos and gives the end users ability to customize their work flow to threat hunt according to their business needs.

Incentivized

• Reduction in IT operational costs

Incentivized

• XDR helps contain a security incident event to reduce business impact
• XDR provides real time visibility to alert the business on security risks
• XDR provides ways to mitigate threats

Incentivized