Cisco Storage Area Networking vs. Huawei OceanStor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Storage Area Networking
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states that the Cisco MDS 9000 multilayer SAN switches can help lower the total cost of ownership (TCO) of storage environments. They combine what the vendor describes as a robust, flexible hardware architecture with multiple layers of network and storage-management intelligence. With them, users can build highly available, scalable storage networks with advanced security and unified management.N/A
Huawei OceanStor
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Huawei offers OceanStor Dorado, an all-flash storage system boasting a wide range of applications and versatility to meet the needs SMBs, larger enterprises, or vertical industry applications.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Features
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Storage Area Networking
-
Ratings
Huawei OceanStor
9.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Flash Array Performance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Compression00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Simplicity00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Power Savings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.9 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.0 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Storage Area NetworkingHuawei OceanStor
Likelihood to Recommend
The best scenario where we found the Cisco Storage Area Networking is best suited is for an architecture where we need a robust technology that provides high level SLAs regarding downtime due to maintenance activities. Our infrastructure provides the core to our Data analytics team, which provides the data needed for our commercial and management leaders to make the right decisions thanks to the data. We need our infrastructure to be robust and reliable, when it runs smoothly, we can focus on other aspects of IT Infrastructure areas, giving our inside business clients the service they need.
Read full review
Easy tools for the user to set and flexibility of the functionalities is amazing and Huawei OceanStor can migrate a group of different data from other third parties platforms easily and generation of excellent data analytics through Huawei OceanStor is also easy and profitable. The environment on which the user can manage multiple data through Huawei OceanStor is incredible.
Read full review
Pros
  • Provide low latency SAN access
  • Easy to configure configuration language
  • Great support from vendor
  • No loss of service when doing maintenance activities
Read full review
  • The Huawei OceanStor Dorado All Flash NVMe storage array provides maximum performance.
  • The OceanStor Dorado is ideally suited for use with databases, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI), Virtual Machines, and file server environments.
  • The capital and maintenance costs were very competitive for a similar storage system at other storage vendors.
Read full review
Cons
  • Centralized Management through DCNM
  • Cost (Port License Cost vs New Switch)
  • 3rd Party SFP+ Compatibility
  • Smart Zoning (personally prefer SIMT)
Read full review
  • Support desk to be available.
  • Implementation to new people is not that easy.
  • Setting of the advance features on Huawei OceanStor may not be easy to all users.
Read full review
Performance
Has always worked just as it should.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
When purchasing support for your Huawei OceanStor system, there are two support options offered by Huawei (i.e. Hi-Care and Co-Care). Huawei Hi-Care service is when Huawei responds to your technical requests for remote troubleshooting and advance hardware replacement in the shortest possible time. Hi-Care provides onsite technical support to help you maintain a more efficient and stable network environment and improve network productivity. Whereas, Huawei Co-Care service is a collaborative solution delivered by Huawei certified partners. Depending on the capability of your Huawei support partners, I would recommend Hi-Care for mission-critical environments since this ensures Huawei takes responsibility for meeting the support SLAs. If you have very capable Huawei support partners, then Co-care could be a more cost-effective support option.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We looked at the Brocade G series and IBM SAN switches, but the seamless integration into our AAA suite and availability of skills in our local market were big factors. We also have these deployed in FlexPod and VxBlock environments, which the reference architectures provide additional confidence in the solutions overall compatibility, supportability and sustainability.
Read full review
The Huawei OceanStor product line is very broad and they offer a wide range of storage systems from entry-level for the small enterprise to high-end storage systems for those demanding workloads typically required at medium to large enterprises. Huawei OceanStor is very reliable with many software features at competitive costs when compared to other storage systems. Huawei OceanStor can easily integrate within the data centre as their system supports many operating systems, hypervisors, SAN switches etc. Another important point to note is that Huawei has made it known that they spend a substantial amount of their revenue in R&D and that is confirmed in the reliability of their products.
Read full review
Scalability
We tend to not deploy MDS's in an ISL deployment pattern, rather deploying a single unit with high enough port density to suit our requirements. Our standard switches are either 9248 or 9396's. My only issue is the high cost of adding additional port licenses "golden screwdrivers" for existing infrastructure. Historically its been cheaper to add a new switch and ISL than add additional licenses if you only have 1/4 to 1/2 licensed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • No connection drops
  • Allowed easy management of the UCS Chassis
  • Allows fast data transfers
Read full review
  • Cost of ownership is advantageous compared to other products
  • Can significantly reduce the cost with compression and deduplication
  • Energy consumption is low, as it shows on its own dashboard a monthly average of 301.25 kWh
Read full review
ScreenShots