TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Snort vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Snort

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ASourcefire developed Snort, an open source intrusion prevention system capable of real-time traffic analysis and packet logging. Snort was acquired (and is now supported) by Cisco in 2013.N/A

    Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Intrusion Prevention System (replacing the former McAfee Network Security Platform) is an intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) for on-prem or virtual networks.N/A
    Pricing
    SnortTrellix Intrusion Prevention System
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SnortTrellix Intrusion Prevention System
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    SnortTrellix Intrusion Prevention System
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Snort
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Proofpoint Advanced Threat Protection
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Proofpoint Advanced Threat Protection
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SnortTrellix Intrusion Prevention System
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (5 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SnortTrellix Intrusion Prevention System
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    If a colleague was looking to tighten down their network I can easily recommend Snort to them. It gives you some more peace of mind knowing that its always scanning traffic for malicious looking code. Even things your major firewalls and security hardware might miss, Snort has picked up. Its an easy recommendation for me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    McAfee Network Security does do what it promises, and it integrates nicely with other McAfee services my work computer has. Sometimes I do feel though that McAfee does hinder your computer/internet performance, but maybe it's a trade-off that's worth it. I do wish they would refine their threat detection so some websites that I don't think are harmful and want to visit for work purposes aren't blocked. There's been times where I google a question and a website has the answer but McAfee will block it. If you're in a position at a financial company like me, where you're dealing with sensitive/private information, it's important to have this type of software to protect data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • IPS detection.
    • DoS detection.
    • Packet logging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Download protection
    • Keeps you from harmful sites
    • Encrypts computer data
    • Prevents DDoS attacks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • At times can be unstable with Cisco bugs, require frequent upgrading.
    • FTD images that are being pushed for ASAs are less efficient from an administration standpoint, no CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Sometimes can slow internet/computer speed
    • At times can stop software downloads that I don't deem harmful and need to download
    • May also block a website that isn't harmful that I wanted to visit because it has helpful information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    For our organization, the Cisco defense in depth concept works the best. While Cisco can be made to work with other vendors, we have found the best in depth protection by integrating Cisco products for maximum visibility. We had a Barracuda Web Filter, but it was difficult to maintain when you had limited scope on what you could block, so we created a whitelist only setup which required a lot of additional manpower. This wouldn't have covered new threats with DNS spoofing and the like. Sourcefire also integrated with our anti-malware platform (Cisco AMP) for even better visibility on what may be happening on the end users workstation. We are planning on adding in Cisco ISE to complete the approach and possibly stealthwatch to cover our bases in the future. The Palo Alto gear was interesting, but it was priced far out of our range.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Being open source, ROI on free is hard to beat for something that works.
    • I believe it greatly enhances the security of my network.
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Protects information
    • Keeps viruses off of programs
    • Integrates seamlessly with other McAfee products on my computer
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots