Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive, cloud-managed endpoint security solution designed to protect devices from advanced malware and cyber threats throughout the entire attack lifecycle—before, during, and after an attack. It offers powerful prevention capabilities to identify and stop threats before they compromise your systems, using multifaceted techniques including risk-based vulnerability management and posture assessments. The solution provides deep visibility and advanced detection…N/A
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Comodo Cybersecurity headquartered in Clifton offers Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) provides malicious file quarantine, malware protection, antivirus, and other endpoint security features.
$4
Per Device Per Month
Pricing
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Premium
$4.00
Per Device Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Features
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Endpoint
7.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
8.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology6.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Centralized Management4.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management6.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Malware Detection8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure EndpointComodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco Secure Endpoint is well suited for keeping track of the many different and points that we have in our organization. All of these devices can easily be monitored with Cisco Secure Endpoint. It can monitor our servers and our desktops and laptops in our environment. It isn’t as appropriate for our student devices. However, those aren’t as critical since they are just Chromebooks.
Read full review
Overall great product. I am confident that the product is doing the job we expect. There are times of trouble, but more so when they update the clients or make major changes. It seems they do not do enough testing before pushing releases.
Read full review
Pros
  • Threat identification: it finds things we wouldn't have even been looking for.
  • Integration with Secure Malware Analytics for automatic submission of suspicious files.
  • In-depth and complex configuration options for finely tuned policies for different users and endpoints.
  • Part of the Cisco Secure Client product for easier distribution and reduction of running agents on end-user devices
  • Integrates with Secure-X for single-pane of glass view of dashboards.
Read full review
  • Mitigates exposure to unwanted files and malware.
  • Ease of Use and Management.
  • Administrator control unlike standard antivirus purchased in the consumer/small business market.
Read full review
Cons
  • The update mechanism of the client is not obvious and takes some finesse to learn
  • The clients auto update signatures, but not agents which I have seen lead to mixed version levels as it is harder to keep up with
  • It is generally a challenge to manage the licenses and if you let the license lapse, it is a very bad thing in my opinion.
Read full review
  • Stability, they could grow when it comes to updates to the client. There always seems to be complications.
  • Locking of systems. In the event of trouble, systems lock down so far that the administrator has to drive to the location where device is located, uninstall and reinstall.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
the renewal must be studied with different factors
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
no complain and no issue with availability
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
In terms of technical support for Cisco Secure Endpoint, the support has been pretty good. All the cases I submitted were solved in a reasonable time frame, and it was a good experience. However, I find that not as many vendors have the expertise I would expect.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
no participation in implementation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements that come into play, we're benefiting from them. We're benefiting from the Telos threat intel, which is really good as well
Read full review
I was using a platform called Barkly which seemed to work well at the time. I ran a ransomware simulation against Barkly and it did not perform as well as anticipated. I began searching for another AV platform, found Comodo and decided to run the same ransomware test. Comodo [Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)] performed much better and was more effective at stopping the simulated ransomware.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It ensures minimal spread of cyber threats in case of infiltration thanks to containment response capabilities.
  • By keeping our endpoints threat-proof, our systems and devices run efficiently hence better productivity.
  • It frees IT staff thanks to its automation and ability to keep threats away with minimal intervention.
Read full review
  • Increased [efficiency]
  • Can centrally manage the endpoints
  • Mitigation of threats/vulnerabilities to the endpoint
Read full review
ScreenShots