Cisco Multicloud Defense vs. FireMon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Multicloud Defense
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
A solution to simplify security and gain multidirectional protection across any public or private cloud to block inbound attacks, lateral movement, and data exfiltration using a single solution. Cisco Multicloud Defense protects all cloud environments using a single software-as-a-service (SaaS) control plane, eliminating inefficient, complex, and costly point solutions.N/A
FireMon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
Pricing
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Features
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Cloud Computing Security Features
Comparison of Cloud Computing Security Features features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Multicloud Defense
8.1
Ratings
4% above category average
FireMon
-
Ratings
Automated Data Backup and Recovery8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Intrusion Detection and Prevention:7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Regular Vulnerability Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Identity and Access Management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Data Transfer8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Incident Response8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance and Auditing8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
The sell key was for my company the monitoring all outgoing data and between each cloud provider which we use from all departments which keeps their data in a cloud environment. We could apply specific rules for monitoring and DPL on all traffic, which was the key feature that we were missing in the cloud solution. Also, they provide security features like intrusion prevention, antimalware, and full-path URL filtering, which are nice to have. Applying all at the start can be really time consuming but for the time we spent and how the solution help us to prevent data leave our company it was for sure worth it.
Read full review
FireMon is best used in a large environment (for example, I have >100
firewalls in my environment). It's best used when trying to improve
security posture and showing changes in firewall security over time. It
might not be the best choice for smaller environments or those that aren't concerned about security management.
Read full review
Pros
  • DLP monitoring - key item for us which helps to view if anything which should leave our environment our or even between each part of network between/inside specific clouds
  • Segmentation of subnet, basic but helpful to isolate each host into their own part of single subnet and connect them, including all visibility features which are offered by Cisco defense systems
  • Allow/deny rules helps us to block, monitor and logs traffic passing in each direction of our environment
Read full review
  • PCI Reporting - After identifying which firewalls and rulesets are in scope, producing a report artifact to satisfy PCI requirements on Firewall reviews is literally a two-click operation.
  • Storing Rule Metadata - FireMon stores metadata (prefilled fields, standard fields, and custom fields) for each rule in each policy which is valuable for context during firewall reviews in particular
  • API - FireMon exposes most if not all of its functionality via REST API
Read full review
Cons
  • Logs can be tricky to navigate
  • GUI can sometimes be confusing
  • Wish there was a better sizing recommendation for gateway deployments
Read full review
  • Some features could be added to the existing functionality which include NAT rules usage
  • Rule expiration normalization from firewalls rather than entering them in rule documentation
  • .csv exports of the files from the firewall pane only gives usage for 30 days by default and that should be increased
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
If it maintains its current direction it will be very disruptive in the cloud security space
Read full review
Once all the customization has been completed, the business is starting to see the return on investment. The visibility it provides into the network gear that is owned by other IT groups is immeasurable and has allowed us to apply standards across the board. The only thing I have concern with is their support documentation.
Read full review
Usability
Ease of Use
Read full review
It save me time and I'm able to have the review - review the rule independently with using my time.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
FireMon has been relatively stable overall. However, there have been a handful of times where we had issues with the console. For example, we couldn't update which devices to include in a security assessment. The initial suggestion from support was to just reboot it. It seems like there weren't many other options available such as to restart services before going to the extreme of a complete reboot.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
I'm not sure we have the largest implementation of FireMon out there but we do have a few 1000 devices being probed by FireMon. Overall, the system's performance has been rock solid. The console refreshes quickly and reports are generated within an expected timeframe.
Read full review
Support Rating
As of yet I havent logged a TAC case - It will be interesting to see how it is supported as a new product in the medium term
Read full review
FireMon technical support is awesome! They respond quickly to our requests and they are well trained and very knowledgeable about the tool. Some issues have to be referred to the development team, but technical support largely provides solutions for any issues that we may have.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation is fairly simple. Most issues can be resolved by referencing manuals.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The ease of use, analytics, and just overall security feature set of Cisco Multicloud Defense is hard to beat. Their product is very intriguing and quite a bit similar. However, I have learned from past experiences that you get what you pay for. Cisco may be a little more pricy but it is worth it.
Read full review
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can easily import firewalls and begin to work on them to improve them
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Firemon Is easily scalable and maintainable with any size team. Although it requires some tech debt, it is well worth the time to invest to ensure compliance is visible and reports are accurate. Although our environment is very large we do not fully utilize the scalability of the Firemon product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved a lot of money on Operational Overhead. I would say we were able to save more than 10 hours every week.
Read full review
  • It helps us save us time in determining what change was made and by whom.
  • Real time alerting is a great convenience in helping us know if something went wrong, we can immediately review the last report to determine what has changed.
  • Allows us to determine what rules are not used and if said rules are still required.
Read full review
ScreenShots