Check Point Quantum Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco Meraki vMX

We are a heavily invested Meraki environment, from our corporate locations to APs. Using a vMX as apposed another solution is a no brainer. It integrates well, has the same benefits as the rest of the Meraki stack, and you can leverage your favorite cloud platform

Incentivized

• Stability: Using Cisco Meraki vMX with auto-VPN instead of non-Meraki peers toward Azure
• Management: Easy to manage on the Cisco Meraki vMX Dashboard
• Centralization: With Cisco Meraki vMX, we can centralize/ standardize our setups

Incentivized

• some organizations may require more throughput than what vMX-L can offer
• there are almost no security controls as the vMX is in VPN concentrator mode

Incentivized

In terms of the Cisco suite, we also have Cisco Webex Calling IP deck solution right out across our centers. That has proven to be phenomenal in terms of performance and stability. With that alone, we've cut back our incident rate of telephony related issues by half essentially, which used to be our top rated issue previously. So the WebEx IP deck solution would be another product I would recommend.

Incentivized

We have over 350 locations and growing. We chose Cisco Meraki vMX because of ease of use and how it scales.

Incentivized

• The speed of configuration is shortened due to it being under one portal
• Support has saved time during outages by quickly fixing issues
• Site-to-site VPNs are easy and fast to set up when swapping our equipment

Incentivized