Cisco Meraki MG vs. ExtremeCloud SD-WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meraki MG
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki MG cellular gateways are a cloud managed WAN solution designed to seamlessly transpose a wireless cellular signal to wired Ethernet, providing primary or failover connectivity.N/A
ExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Extreme Networks wireless offerings increased following the Enterasys acquisition in 2013 and later, Aerohive. To unify all disparate elements and centralize control of the network all the way to the branch, ExtremeCloud SD-WAN is Extreme Networks' solution for simplicity and control.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meraki MGExtremeCloud SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
We utilize it for those job site trailers, so it is perfect for a small job site where you want to provide that internet coverage to those users of those job sites, especially if they're in a remote location. We've actually even used this as the secondary internet to supplement in case the primary fiber line went down. And in my experience, we've had a site go down and use this as the backup internet and most of our users didn't even know. So as far as cons, I don't really, cost depending on the job site and your budget. That would be, I guess the only thing I would say would just justify not using it, but I don't have any reason to not use it.
Read full review
I can say that as an infrastructure analyst I can have absolute control over the wireless network with the Aerohive Wireless WLAN architecture. We manage the network via the Web from anywhere and we have, from a graphical interface, a view and status of all installed access points. We receive notifications when an issue arises and we've already been able to resolve the case. The prices are very good and it has a very modern and compact appearance and design. We recommend technical support also to avoid future hardware issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Seamless changeover to LTE (Cellulor network) in times of failure of ethernet connectivity in your company.
  • Continuous backup for ethernet. No Downtime experienced.
  • It provides you with ability to manage all devices in your network.
  • Next generation Firewall, Traffic Shaper and Internet Gateway that is centrally managed on web.
Read full review
  • The hardware is well designed and crafted.
  • The software that supports the hardware is user friendly and intuitive.
  • The support by Aerohive is timely and responsive.
Read full review
Cons
  • A DHCP configuration would be fine, but a fixed IP configuration seems to require a twist in the configuration.
  • If possible, it's just a subscription. With no initials and just a subscription, I think it's a "feature product" that may convince the superior even if the price is a bit high.
  • I am happy with wireless and all in one, but I feel that the management screen is old, so I think it is better to renew it a bit more.
Read full review
  • More customized reports functionality
  • VLAN probe tool not always accurate in our case
  • Continue to grow features of Companion mobile app
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It does what it is supposed to, with minimal issue!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The only other cellular provider that we've evaluated was, I think it was called Sky Link, and it was a little USB module that plugged into the Meraki MXs and we had nothing but problems with it, which is why we ended up switching to the MG 20 ones.
Read full review
Since 2003/04, I've evaluated, used, configured, and set up dozens of Wifi networks and none has had the capabilities and complex abilities that Aerohive offers as a solution. During the evaluation period, it was a clear standout from an office and business environment due to the advanced configuration options and security settings that were required.
Read full review
Scalability
In terms of scalability, The MG Meraki is unvanquished! As it works on cellular signals, as long as you have the required signal strength, you are connected. Removes the dependency on cables to connect to our ISP. So geographical locations do not affect the scalability of MG. Which is the whole point of having a Cellular to Wired Ethernet Device. And it can also be managed with the web centrally.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The ROI is excellent, over time we have been able to avoid outages even though our WAN provider may have had issues, the switch to LTE via Cisco Meraki MGwas smooth
  • in locations where traditional lan links were not feasible, like mobile locations, this has been a saver
  • they can be placed where mobile phone reception is best without LAN
Read full review
  • Positively, has saved us money not needing to upgrade access points every 2-3 years
  • Upgrading to Wifi 6/6e is on the horizon for us, so staying on top of technology/security is important.
Read full review
ScreenShots