TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco IOx vs. K3s Lightweight Kubernetes

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco IOx

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe Cisco IOx application environment combines IoT application execution within the fog, secure connectivity with Cisco IOS Software, and services for rapid, reliable integration with Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and the cloud.N/A

    K3s Lightweight Kubernetes

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AK3s is a lightweight, certified Kubernetes distribution built for IoT & Edge computing, developed by Rancher Labs, which is now supported by SUSE since the 2020 acquisition. K3s is available free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco IOxK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco IOxK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cisco IOxK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Internet of Things
    Comparison of Internet of Things features of Cisco IOx and K3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Feature
    Cisco IOx
    -
    Ratings
    K3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    IoT Device Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Device Security00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Cisco IOxK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco IOxK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is well suited for local development. K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is not well suited when you need backward support. In the case that you want to test an application that is still using deprecated APIs or CRDs which are supported on popular managed Cloud Kubernetes Distributions, because K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is trying to be a lightweight application and dropping early support for APIs/CRDs marked for deprication K3s Lightweight Kubernetes will not be a good solution. If you are trying to test Kubernetes etc, functionality, K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is not a good case since it's using Dqlite or SQLite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    • Virtual clusters
    • IoT devices
    • Local development
    • Raspberry Pi
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    • Option to deploy a self managed k3s in the cloud
    • Support to deploy it with kubeadm
    • Integration with prometheus & grafana
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    We have mostly used kind, minikube, and Docker Desktop Kubernetes for local development. Only kind has lower resource requirements, but K3s Lightweight Kubernetes seems to be even lighter. It is a big benefit to be able to deploy a K3s Lightweight Kubernetes cluster in seconds locally in our workstation, there is no cost, and it makes it easy to redeploy from scratch no matter how many times we want. The removal of deprecated APIs or CRDs also makes it more secure since it reduces unnecessarily exposed attack vectors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE
    • Engineers have been able to run more microservices locally with K3s Lightweight Kubernetes instead of Minikube, which is more resources hungry
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots