Cisco IoT Operations Dashboard (discontinued) vs. Hitachi Lumada

I would highly recommend Cisco IoT for viewing real-time network device visibility. The monitoring dashboard, besides being map based, is quite intuitive. You won't doze off even after hours of staring. Cisco IoT is notably useful for monitoring commonly connected assets such as ATMs or vending machines. I'd, however, not recommend solely relying on Cisco's traffic to dashboard encryption since it's a vulnerable channel.

Incentivized

Organizations may use sensors like RFID and break beams to automatically monitor components as they travel through the assembly. Real-time data from IoT may help managers and supervisors monitor the performance of their teams. With this level of transparency, bottlenecks can be identified, problems can be pinpointed, and progress can be made more quickly.

Incentivized

• UI/UX and visualisation part is the awesome.

Incentivized

• Remotely production monitoring.
• Track workforce productivity.
• Asset optimization.

Incentivized

• have additional languages
• remote location access

Incentivized

• Data security can be improved.
• Adoption flexibility.
• Steep learning curve.

Incentivized

We did tests and as for the previous products there were some bugs so it was discarded and because of them we decided for Cisco that the price is high but it compensates with the network and its operations support that worked well in addition the technical support is fast.

Incentivized

A lot of components are available and able to use what you need. Module library, Advanced analytics. Batch data processing. Variety of ways to integrate. Cost-effective. These are some of the ways Hitachi Lumada ranks above the ones we have used.

Incentivized

• Improved productivity
• secured organizational processes.

Incentivized

• Overall cost.
• Financial/organizational viability.
• Strong services expertise.

Incentivized