TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Firepower 2100 Series vs. Smoothwall UTM

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Firepower 2100 Series

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACisco offers the Firepower 2100 Series NGFW, designed to allow businesses to gain resiliency through superior security with sustained performance. The Firepower 2100 Series has a dual multicore CPU architecture that optimizes firewall, cryptographic, and threat inspection functions simultaneously, to achieve security doesn’t come at the expense of network performance.N/A

    Smoothwall UTM

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ASmoothwall UTM is a firewall security suite for educational environments. It includes the standard firewall services, as well as load balancing, and has hardware and software deployment options.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Editions & Modules
    Firepower 2100
    3,000-20,000
    per appliance
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Firewall
    Comparison of Firewall features of Cisco Firepower 2100 Series and Smoothwall UTM
    Feature
    Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Smoothwall UTM
    9.3
    1 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Identification Technologies7.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Content Inspection9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Policy-based Controls9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Active Directory and LDAP6.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Firewall Management Console10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Reporting and Logging9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    VPN10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    High Availability10.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Stateful Inspection8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Proxy Server6.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Visualization Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Small Businesses
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.5 out of 10
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    5.5
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesSmoothwall UTM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    The Cisco [Firepower] 2100 [Series] is an easy sell for anyone looking. You already know Cisco excels in the security department, but now that firepower lives right on the box and inline with the rest of the firewall data flow you can save yourself a lot of time and headaches. Unless you cant quite afford Cisco's 2100 line, there's not much reason to go with the competition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Smoothwall
    After a year of using the Smoothwall UTM Firewall solution, we can say that it is a secure solution, it offers a graphical interface for configuration and access with easy understanding and usability, the security features and blocking of url and applications work very well and also protects against malware and ransomware. For small and even intermediate scenarios I recommend it, but not for very large scenarios. Licenses can be renewed and are priced very well compared to competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • For us, to power the whole system does scaling quite a bit. So we can definitely have a lot of room to grow if needed. The device can support a lot of way more than we need right now, but in the future, if we need more it seems to be a big pro of that. Also the support of Cisco, knowing that it's backed by Cisco definitely is good. You guys are the largest players in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Smoothwall
    • easy to manage by its web platform that allows quick access to system functions
    • allows the administration of the company's network by creating IP navigation permissions to prevent access to unprotected pages
    • this system can be installed on computers with very few resources and even with old equipment just by adapting an additional network card. This is helpful for companies that are starting and do not have much capital to invest but need to protect their systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Cisco patches bugs quickly but patches are slow to install and reboot
    • Smart licensing is getting better but still can be troublesome
    • Some weird visual interface glitches that require clicking the same options a few extra times
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Smoothwall
    • Rare problems have been noticed when there are many connections at the same time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Smoothwall
    Smoothwall is a system that is cheaper than just a free license due to being a Linux distribution. Simplewall is a bit more for robust equipment or large networks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • It's keeping threats out like a firewall should. Definitely cost wise it is at a higher cost center than other alternatives. Especially when it comes to licensing. Cisco is generally the higher, for perhaps, definitely for good reason, right? I mean, definitely positive impact as far as working as it should that's at cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Smoothwall
    • Internal network security and intruder protection for a cost-effective solution.
    • The solution contributed and greatly reduced malware attacks and ddos ​​attacks.
    • Reports allowed more accurate analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots