Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. IBM Storage Scale

Cisco Cloud Object [Storage's] primary objective is to offer a secure, standard, and professional storage space, for the content that the company has. Further, Cisco Cloud Object Storage makes the access and the [sharing] of every detail efficient and remarkable. Again, the monitoring and overseeing of the database from Cisco Cloud Object Storage is [progress] that the developer established. Finally, the application [enhances] data migration, an effective way of managing content.

Incentivized

IBM Spectrum Scale creates excellent and real time data results and the capability to extract data and data modeling tools via IBM Spectrum Scale is amazing. The capacity planning and data archiving and the data security offered by IBM Spectrum Scale is more productive and the data quality control using the system is impressive.

• Content Monitoring
• Data Storage
• File checking

Incentivized

• Good for storage Optimizing.
• Good velocity.
• Strong agility in the product.

Incentivized

• The first tools configuration can be easy.
• Handling complex data storage is not easy.
• Moving a large media files functionality can be improved.

Incentivized

• Price
• Requires a learning curve and training to manage the product

Incentivized

Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) stands out in terms of scalability, reliability, and security. Even the storage plans are competitive with other cloud object storage providers. It provides great performance for unstructured data and large datasets, which are highly used in industries requiring analyses of large datasets. For an efficient user experience, it also provides content delivery for the users spanning across the globe.

Incentivized

Incentivized

When we implemented the Spectrum Scale solution, we had in place a NetApp FAS series working in Metro Cluster mode. What is great about NetApp is its low maintenance. On the other hand, it lacks performance, especially on the CPU nodes. We needed a solution that will deliver steady performance while keeping a steady growth.

Incentivized

• Cheaper to use Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) than the on-premise storage and hence savings in infrastructure cost.
• Using Cloud based storage has reduced the manpower resources required to maintain the storage infrastructure, further reducing costs.
• Overall, end-user latency has reduced by using Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) as a content delivery network for the media files.

Incentivized

• Different versions in a short period of time
• Re-creation of the certificates after an update creates confusion

Incentivized