Checkmarx vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Checkmarx

Checkmarx

21 Reviews and Ratings

Rapid7 AppSpider

Rapid7 AppSpider

5 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Checkmarx	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)	N/A
Rapid7 AppSpider	Score 9.3 out of 10	N/A	AppSpider, from Boston-based Rapid7, is an application security and testing offering based on technology acquired from NT OBJECTives (their similarly named software NTOSpider, acquired with the company during April, 2015).	$2,000 Per Application

Pricing

Checkmarx

Rapid7 AppSpider

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

InsightAppSec: $2,000.00
Per Application

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Checkmarx	Rapid7 AppSpider
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Checkmarx	Rapid7 AppSpider

Best Alternatives
	Checkmarx	Rapid7 AppSpider
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Checkmarx	Rapid7 AppSpider
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Checkmarx	Rapid7 AppSpider
Likelihood to Recommend	If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans. Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review	Rapid7 AppSpider could be your default DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing), it covers the OWASP top 10 for web and APIs. Great tools, with a very nice and understandable report and analytics, work excellent for one-shot or continuous monitoring of your web assets. Also has a fair amount of integrations with other popular tools. Incentivized Randy Varela Offensive Security Engineer Lead Read full review
Pros	Supports a large number of languages Finds a large variety of potential risks Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	OWASP Top 10. Crawling web applications. Web application security testing. Incentivized Randy Varela Offensive Security Engineer Lead Read full review
Cons	DAST capability can be the one where it does not support native use case of using OTP based arch API Scanning is something that lacks a bit due to not much customizations Branch wise reports for SAST is not available Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review	Scan might be slow compared to other tools. Not a lot of training on the vendor side. Incentivized Randy Varela Offensive Security Engineer Lead Read full review
Usability	Checkmarx's usability is generally good, but it can be a bit complex for new users. The interface may take some time to get used to, especially for those unfamiliar with security tools. Once you become familiar with it, it’s effective and integrates well into development workflows. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Incentivized Randy Varela Offensive Security Engineer Lead Read full review
Return on Investment	Great diversity of vulnerabilities covered. Quicker scans They are feature rich compared to other tools I used in the past. Dashboards are not customizable enough. High number of false positives take up time and sometimes make our report look bad. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Great ROI for consultant projects. Incentivized Randy Varela Offensive Security Engineer Lead Read full review
ScreenShots