Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security Management vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Check Point Quantum Smart-1
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Check Point offers security management architecture delivered from the Cloud designed to manage security across on-premise Firewalls, Networks, Cloud, Mobile and IoT. The Smart-1 security management solution is available in cloud and appliance-based editions.N/A
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (formerly Firepower Management Center) are a firewall policy and intrusion detection appliance management system, providing an administrative nerve center for managing critical Cisco network security solutions. It provides complete and unified management over firewalls, application control, intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and advanced malware protection. Easily go from managing a firewall to controlling applications to investigating and remediating…N/A
Pricing
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Check Point Quantum Smart-1Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Features
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security Management
8.5
Ratings
3% above category average
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Policy planning and rule management8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration9.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Device Discovery8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans9.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Check Point Quantum Smart-1 Security ManagementCisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very suitable to manage and monitor a large amount of network security information. It is not recommended to use the network information security management of a single firewall device in terms of cost.
Read full review
Cisco Secure FMC is great for managing firewalls, but not so great for troubleshooting firewalls. It makes setting up VPNs between devices easy, and makes creating ACLs a breeze, but it is tough to grasp how to actually view the troubleshooting logs. The Connection Events tab doesn't always show all the information you need either, so troubleshooting specific events requires some more detective work.
Read full review
Pros
  • Expanded memory (RAM) and new SSD storage for faster system response when searching logs, creating reports or viewing events
  • The ability to quickly analyze logs and events can shorten our response time for handling information security incidents
  • The expansion management method of the device itself is very flexible. It can be adjusted according to actual needs.
Read full review
  • Great protection and security against the multiple digital virus attacks.
  • Provides detailed logs to track any threat and helps to secure the network promptly.
  • VPN service for remote access of important organizational applications.
  • Best management tool for controlling data and bandwidth resources.
Read full review
Cons
  • Not many
  • Expensive though comparatively lately these devices have stayed fairly consistent while other vendors have increased greatly and are catching up.
  • Support is limited, though this can be an advantage because of the security.
Read full review
  • Areas like Computer Security need a console to view events.
  • The different support areas would be greatly benefited if they managed to have consoles and alerts that told them where to mitigate the risks.
  • The scope of areas such as Monitoring and Dispatch have a broad vision with tools such as applying the necessary filters for your environment.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are very satisfied with SecureX and it's adaptive, active nature in protecting or data and systems. It's easy to administer, update, review notifications and update when necessary. Cisco's security practice fits into our needs and continues to evolve as global cyber events change. SecureX is easy to migrate to new cisco gear as we upgrade to newer models when supports ends on older gear. Enabling fast ROI during these capital expenditure projects.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall usability is an eight for me because it is easy to manage the firewall policies and monitor the devices' health. The configurations are all done in the GUI which makes it more convenient and hassle free. You can also see the devices' health and the progress of the task thru its taskbar.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Since moving to Cisco secure management center from firepower management center we've had no application issues, outages or any other problems. It's always been there for us and always provides us the necessary protection and notification when we need it. Been very happy with all of our Cisco systems over our tenure to date.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have the direct support of the manufacturer through its service channels, the attention is 24/7, and the response time is acceptable. The support for this tool is almost nil. It all depends on the level of implementation is carried out so that it can fail and request collaboration. Anyway, the manufacturer backs the entire Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC series appliances) solution.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Cisco secure firewall management center is easy to install, moderate to setup in conjunction with firewall hardware, and administration of policy changes afterwards is pretty straight forward. And flexible to add more advanced security configurations as needed. Cisco support website is pretty good for researching how to documentation too. Cisco secure firewall management center enables integration to SecureX - the cloud security protection service. And AMP which protects packet flow with real time analysis. Cisco secure fmc is the evolved name for cisco firepower management center so for those customers who have firepower this is a simple migration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Far exceeds any testing we were able to think of when testing.
Read full review
Palo Alto Panorama is more user-friendly and provided faster policy deployment compared to Cisco FMC. Panorama is more stable compared to Cisco FMC. Cisco FMC is better when compared to CheckPoint Smart Console. Configuration and troubleshooting in CheckPoint Smart Console are more complicated and are not as user-friendly as it is in Cisco FMC
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Hardware is very solid so time for maintenance is extremely limited.
  • Patching is limited due to the strength of the code releases also time for maintenance is extremely limited
  • Annually reoccurring costs for licenses can be expensive
Read full review
  • We are able to more easily manage the firewalls and their rules via the UI versus relying on an MSP.
  • We were not aware of the site-to-site capability limitations when purchasing, so we had to purchase additional hardware to repair that issue at the time.
  • The API does make it easy to build multiple rules, objects, etc. in bulk, and we have used it quite a lot. This prevents tedious and typo-prone tasks from occurring on the regular.
  • Multiple cases have been required for issues with the firewalls and the management center.
Read full review
ScreenShots