Check Point CloudGuard Cloud Native Security Platform vs. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management

Checkpoint Cloud Guard Native Security Platform is much better in native cloud infra security requirements. It works well, and the manageability of said product is good. But If you are having some hybrid kind of environment, it is not suitable, and the products have more complexity to deploy. There are so many other players to do well in this segment.

Incentivized

Dome9 can be used to have visibility into cloud assets and security policies across all the virtual networks, regions, and accounts on AWS, Azure and GCP. It also provides continuous enforcement of regulatory compliance standards and security best practices, with the ability to auto-remediate misconfigurations. So Dome9 is well suited for companies using cloud providers that want to take control of their resources.

Incentivized

• Cloud Native integration.
• Excellent and Clean UI.
• Cloud Infra Security Management.

Incentivized

• Minimal false positives if configured properly.
• End to end visibility in real-time.
• Multi platform monitoring.

Incentivized

• Deployment method.
• Technical support.
• Cloud-based manageability.

Incentivized

• Needs to add features for an on-premise cloud.
• Cost is a little high.

Incentivized

Is easy to use, and the standad configuration is well prepared.

Incentivized

Checkpoint support is great. They provide great SLAs and they comply with service times accordingly.

Incentivized

We have performed all research and evaluation for all competitive players as well we did POC for every product. Based on our comparison chart, we found Check Point Cloud Guard Native Security Platform much better and works extremally well compared to all other peers. It has a robust architecture and has really good features.

Incentivized

First and foremost reason of our client selecting CheckPoint CloudGuard Posture Management / Dome9 was because they already had CheckPoint Firewalls which are in active use e.g. R75.40 and R82.x products. Customization Vs these other Vendors is another great asset Reporting is one more standout feature, + Multi-cloud capabilities Centralized dashboarding is smooth to navigate as compared to other Vendors Syslog handling is much better as compared to some other vendors , Memory and space issues if planned well are less

Incentivized

• Negative - ROI.
• Positive - Good product with UI.
• Negative - Technical Support.

Incentivized

• Having one single pane of glass dashboard helps cut downtime for one tech to assess the overall health of the cloud.
• The cost was a little high, and the setup time was longer than expected to leverage the functionality we paid for fully.
• Overall a good product so far

Incentivized