Certinia ERP Cloud vs. Unanet ERP GovCon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Certinia ERP Cloud
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
Certinia ERP Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric ERP software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.N/A
Unanet ERP GovCon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Unanet ERP GovCon is software for government contractors offered on-premise or in the cloud. Features include resource planning, skills management, budgeting, forecasting, time tracking, expense reporting, billing, revenue recognition, and project status and performance reporting.N/A
Pricing
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Features
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
16% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pay calculation8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
10% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
API for custom integration8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
3% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Accounts payable8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.1
Ratings
3% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pricing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.2
Ratings
17% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
User Ratings
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Certinia ERP CloudUnanet ERP GovCon
Likelihood to Recommend
FFA is a good product if you want the ability to customize functionality and reporting. However, all the setup can be overwhelming if you are looking for an out-of-the-box solution. FFA is a great choice is you are already using Salesforce and want to report on KPIs directly from the source data. There are a lot of applications to help you feed data into the system or export it out in a usable format.
Read full review
As I said, Unanet is great for timekeeping and expense reporting. It's very easy to navigate and intuitive for my staff to use. On the other hand, reports are a challenge. The ones that are "canned" only come out as PDFs so I find I waste a lot of paper each month. Customized reports are better and come in Excel, but setting them up is not that easy. We've been working with Unanet just over a year. We went "live" effective 1/1/2017 and we're still avoiding the reporting functions even though that was one of the main reasons we purchased Unanet in the first place
Read full review
Pros
  • Comprehensive spreadsheets and dashboards with filtering functions.
  • Ease of file upload and conversion to and from Excel.
  • The overall spread of the homepage makes for easy access to whatever information you're looking for.
  • I believe FFA has a tremendous ability to data easy to access by all departments, but also is complex enough to retrieve specific data that is needed.
Read full review
  • Near real-time visibility into project financials. As soon as the employees save their time for the day, you can get a good measure of project financial performance. Work authorizations are embedded into Unanet so unintentional overruns are virtually eliminated.
  • Nice integration with the Joint Travel Regulations. It is easy to import the latest rate tables for both CONUS and OCONUS destinations.
  • Good customer support and highly responsive. Webinars on new features are free and broadcast on a regular basis. Feedback to suggestions for new features are addressed in a very timely fashion.
  • It is easy to structure Unanet to support DCAA practices to be able to get approval for cost plus jobs.
  • With exports to .csv files, it is easy to extract data for further analysis beyond the relatively rich built-in reporting features.
Read full review
Cons
  • It took a very very long time to implement and we had configuration issues after the implementation that had to be addressed.
  • Cannot run scheduled reports.
  • Difficult to run reports (training is needed to configure the reports).
Read full review
  • Adding hours for subcontractors must be done via import because the hours don't update on the reporting if put in via vendor invoice.
  • Make posting dates less complex.
  • Should be easier to figure out roles needed for managers in the organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
If Visualforce pages are enabled, they sometimes slow down the load time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Read full review
Every time I have reached out to customer support, they have been very helpful and resolved my issue very quickly and efficiently
Read full review
Online Training
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
Read full review
We were previously using Deltek GCS. Deltek stopped the support for this software so we were forced to change to a new product. We reviewed Costpoint, a Microsoft product and Unanet. We selected Unanet because it had all of the features we were looking for in a new software and it was very user-friendly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We moved to a subscription business, and FinancialForce cannot facilitate it. After using FinancialForce for 4 years, we had to switch to NetSuite. We had a negative return on investment with all the resources we used to do in-house development in FnancialForce.
  • FinancialForce did not have a good way to match payments against invoices, and it was a very manual process. We spent a lot of human hours to get it done.
  • It was still relatively cheap, so for the 4 years that we used it, the actual cost of the product was what we could only afford at the time.
Read full review
  • Unanet has had a very significant ROI on several fronts. Our payroll department spends much less time managing and processing time in general.
  • Unanet has allowed all of the project managers teams bill on a much more granular level which has saved significant time over the previous Excel based processes of gathering project level data.
  • Using Unanet companywide has also saved many hours of time that were previously spent translating data from other platforms, and consolidating data via Excel for reporting purposes. Using the same tool (Unanet) with the included reports has saved significant time and hassle which has had an enormous impact on the ROI of Unanet.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Unanet ERP GovCon Screenshots

Screenshot of