Certinia ERP Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric ERP software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Pricing
Certinia ERP Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia ERP Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia ERP Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Features
Certinia ERP Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.0
Ratings
57% below category average
Pay calculation
8.50 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
API for custom integration
8.80 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.4
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Single sign-on capability
8.60 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.2
Ratings
33% below category average
Dashboards
8.40 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
Standard reports
6.50 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Custom reports
8.80 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
Ratings
0% below category average
Accounts payable
8.00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.10 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.30 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.40 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.70 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
10.0
Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.9
Ratings
29% below category average
Inventory tracking
10.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Location management
10.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.1
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.7
Ratings
50% below category average
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Order entry
8.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.50 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Travel & Expense Management
10.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
Ratings
13% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
8.2
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.7
Ratings
26% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
4.90 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
5.30 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.4
Ratings
21% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.5
Ratings
49% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Certinia ERP Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
3.5
Ratings
68% below category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
FFA is a good product if you want the ability to customize functionality and reporting. However, all the setup can be overwhelming if you are looking for an out-of-the-box solution. FFA is a great choice is you are already using Salesforce and want to report on KPIs directly from the source data. There are a lot of applications to help you feed data into the system or export it out in a usable format.
It addresses well some integration and connectivity issues with other software and adapted technologies: formulation and manufacturing batching software, scanners and bar codes, inventory, financials, emailing of invoices and statement, sales and purchasing... etc. I believe it to be better suited to a medium to large company. Not as simple and seamless as we expected for migrating from another Microsoft Dynamics software product (we moved from GP to NAV). Our staff is going through a tougher time than we thought to learn some procedures. Normal growing pains?!
All of the Dynamics ERP systems are fully integrated with the full family of their Office products (Word, Excel, etc.) but the true power behind Dynamics-NAV is that it comes with complete access to the source code. Although most ERP packages provide some type of a development environment, it is always a third-party software package and requires an additional expense. NAV comes with full source code access and devolvement tools out-of-the-box and requires no additional purchase. The user is able to modify pages, reports and even add additional fields to the standard tables. If your company has an internal development staff you have the ability to purchase the same full development license that the VAR has, allowing you to handle all system customizations and support in-house. The sum total of this high flexibility is that you are able to make NAV conform to your business rather than you conforming to the software.
In addition to the available source code, NAV provides the user with an unlimited ability to modify and build within the rich environment of C/AL code. In over 20 years of modifying the NAV product I have never had a client ask for a modification or custom functionality that I was not able to provide. Add to this the fact that NAV now includes many development points that allow the user to place their custom code inside of the system without impacting the base code. This makes the upgrade process quick and easy and avoids the common occurrence of being version locked.
The user interface of Dynamics NAV has been well thought out and provides a very easy to learn and use package. Master records (Customer, Vendor, Items, etc.) have been laid out in a standard format. Once you learn where fields are located on one record you have learned them all. The forms (called Pages in NAV) have a very similar structure and, by design, are uncluttered and easily customized by the user without impacting the base code. This allows each user to configure the Page to the way they work, easing the learning process and speeding up daily work and data entry.
The NAV environment has grown to be very feature rich in the functionality offered and provides the user with almost everything they need with the purchase of the base product. Advanced features can be added if required as can a large number of third party add-ons made exclusively for the NAV environment. Additionally, user licenses are sold as concurrent and not as named. Concurrent licenses control the number of users allowed into the system at any one time meaning that anyone can be provided with the ability to log into the system. This allows the company to setup an unlimited number of users with the ability to access the system at any given time. This allows the occasional user to share a license with other users who only need to access the system to enter a small amount of data or run a few reports. This functionality is a plus for the company with a large sales staff or outside workers who only need limited access to the system. Named licenses would require that you purchase an access license for every person who needs to access the system.
There are not a lot of "out of the box" automation processes, for Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Different versions of NAV, have had various job scheduling functionality. However, each process that is automated, must be confirmed that it will function correctly, in an automatic mode. In our installation, most of the automation processes have been custom-developed.
Microsoft Dynamics NAV could have better documentation. Much of the documentation is original, from multiple versions ago. There is generally no step-by-step instructions, on performing various functions. Instead, most help is context-sensitive, obtained by pressing F1, on a particular field.
Older versions of Microsoft Dynamics NAV had a built-in WYSIWYG report builder, which made designing reports fairly straight-forward. Later versions (2013 and forward) rely exclusively on Visual Studio and SQL Reporting Services, which require a greater technical level of expertise, to use.
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Best in terms of reporting or coming up with a great dashboard. Seamlessly collaborated with teams without depending on particular device as its web version is the buddy for people with work flexibility. Licensing price and integrations can be the areas of improvement and can simplify the interface which will be easy for a new user.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
Dynamics fits the modern world, integrating new technology to ensure a complete business process is readily accessible in a rapidly moving world of "in-office" and "remote" work. It solves the need for several departments and streamlines procurement, warehouse, and finance processes.
We moved to a subscription business, and FinancialForce cannot facilitate it. After using FinancialForce for 4 years, we had to switch to NetSuite. We had a negative return on investment with all the resources we used to do in-house development in FnancialForce.
FinancialForce did not have a good way to match payments against invoices, and it was a very manual process. We spent a lot of human hours to get it done.
It was still relatively cheap, so for the 4 years that we used it, the actual cost of the product was what we could only afford at the time.